Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay
This review article appraises the recent trilogy of books on the Roman Inquisition written by the late Thomas F. Mayer. It explains the context in which Mayer came to write these works, the research questions which guided him and the nature of the outputs he delivered before his untimely death. Maye...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016
|
| _version_ | 1797094017912012800 |
|---|---|
| author | Pattenden, M |
| author_facet | Pattenden, M |
| author_sort | Pattenden, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This review article appraises the recent trilogy of books on the Roman Inquisition written by the late Thomas F. Mayer. It explains the context in which Mayer came to write these works, the research questions which guided him and the nature of the outputs he delivered before his untimely death. Mayer's principal theme of the importance of process in guiding inquisitors' actions and activities, is traced through his three volumes: the first a general reconstruction of how the Holy Office operated, the second an application of his insights to specific cases of importance throughout late sixteenth‐ and early seventeenth‐century Italy, the third on the Galileo trial itself. Other scholars have received Mayer's work in a number of different ways, some favorable, others less so. Here, this essay summarizes parameters of the debate which Mayer catalyzed, in particular between scholars of Galileo and of the Inquisition; it also explains the further questions that has risen. Finally, it assesses how, as colleagues, we might extend Mayer's inquires and evaluates the wider impact his work deserves to have in historical studies and, indeed, in contemporary academic discourse. Mayer's insistance on the need to understand the methods and processes of censorship seems especially timely given the general assault on free speech which we currently face on many university campuses. On that basis, his scholarship should continue to resonate with all of us, perhaps in some uncomfortable ways. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:08:19Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:c6f81d84-4be1-41a8-9933-45a7c650bd2b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:08:19Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:c6f81d84-4be1-41a8-9933-45a7c650bd2b2022-03-27T06:41:42ZThomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essayJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c6f81d84-4be1-41a8-9933-45a7c650bd2bSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Pattenden, MThis review article appraises the recent trilogy of books on the Roman Inquisition written by the late Thomas F. Mayer. It explains the context in which Mayer came to write these works, the research questions which guided him and the nature of the outputs he delivered before his untimely death. Mayer's principal theme of the importance of process in guiding inquisitors' actions and activities, is traced through his three volumes: the first a general reconstruction of how the Holy Office operated, the second an application of his insights to specific cases of importance throughout late sixteenth‐ and early seventeenth‐century Italy, the third on the Galileo trial itself. Other scholars have received Mayer's work in a number of different ways, some favorable, others less so. Here, this essay summarizes parameters of the debate which Mayer catalyzed, in particular between scholars of Galileo and of the Inquisition; it also explains the further questions that has risen. Finally, it assesses how, as colleagues, we might extend Mayer's inquires and evaluates the wider impact his work deserves to have in historical studies and, indeed, in contemporary academic discourse. Mayer's insistance on the need to understand the methods and processes of censorship seems especially timely given the general assault on free speech which we currently face on many university campuses. On that basis, his scholarship should continue to resonate with all of us, perhaps in some uncomfortable ways. |
| spellingShingle | Pattenden, M Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title | Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title_full | Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title_fullStr | Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title_short | Thomas F. Mayer (1951-2014) and the Roman Inquisition: a review essay |
| title_sort | thomas f mayer 1951 2014 and the roman inquisition a review essay |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pattendenm thomasfmayer19512014andtheromaninquisitionareviewessay |