Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
Systematic reviews of clinical trials aim to include all relevant studies conducted on a particular topic and to provide an unbiased summary of their results, producing the best evidence about the benefits and harms of medical treatments. Relevant studies, however, may not provide the results for al...
Main Authors: | Kirkham, J, Altman, D, Chan, A, Gamble, C, Dwan, K, Williamson, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Similar Items
-
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
by: Smyth, R, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
by: Smyth, RMD, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Saini, P, et al.
Published: (2014)