A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration

During inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), vision is lost due to photoreceptor cell death; however, a range of optogenetic tools have been shown to restore light responses in animal models. Restored response characteristics vary between tools and the neuronal cell population to which they are de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gilhooley, M, Lindner, M, Palumaa, T, Hughes, S, Peirson, S, Hankins, MW
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cell Press 2022
_version_ 1797106956427591680
author Gilhooley, M
Lindner, M
Palumaa, T
Hughes, S
Peirson, S
Hankins, MW
author_facet Gilhooley, M
Lindner, M
Palumaa, T
Hughes, S
Peirson, S
Hankins, MW
author_sort Gilhooley, M
collection OXFORD
description During inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), vision is lost due to photoreceptor cell death; however, a range of optogenetic tools have been shown to restore light responses in animal models. Restored response characteristics vary between tools and the neuronal cell population to which they are delivered: the interplay between these is complex, but targeting upstream neurons (such as retinal bipolar cells) may provide functional benefit by retaining intraretinal signal processing. In this study, our aim was to compare two optogenetic tools: mammalian melanopsin (hOPN4) and microbial red-shifted channelrhodopsin (ReaChR) expressed within two subpopulations of surviving cells in a degenerate retina. Intravitreal adeno-associated viral vectors and mouse models utilising the Cre/lox system restricted expression to populations dominated by bipolar cells or retinal ganglion cells and was compared with non-targeted delivery using the chicken beta actin (CBA) promoter. In summary, we found bipolar-targeted optogenetic tools produced faster kinetics and flatter intensity-response relationships compared with non-targeted or retinal-ganglion-cell-targeted hOPN4. Hence, optogenetic tools of both mammalian and microbial origins show advantages when targeted to bipolar cells. This demonstrates the advantage of bipolar-cell-targeted optogenetics for vision restoration in IRDs. We therefore developed a bipolar-cell-specific gene delivery system employing a compressed promoter with the potential for clinical translation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:09:44Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c7289152-e772-440d-85bd-78145e4b9103
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:09:44Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Cell Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c7289152-e772-440d-85bd-78145e4b91032022-06-06T16:29:23ZA systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restorationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c7289152-e772-440d-85bd-78145e4b9103EnglishSymplectic ElementsCell Press2022Gilhooley, MLindner, MPalumaa, THughes, SPeirson, SHankins, MWDuring inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), vision is lost due to photoreceptor cell death; however, a range of optogenetic tools have been shown to restore light responses in animal models. Restored response characteristics vary between tools and the neuronal cell population to which they are delivered: the interplay between these is complex, but targeting upstream neurons (such as retinal bipolar cells) may provide functional benefit by retaining intraretinal signal processing. In this study, our aim was to compare two optogenetic tools: mammalian melanopsin (hOPN4) and microbial red-shifted channelrhodopsin (ReaChR) expressed within two subpopulations of surviving cells in a degenerate retina. Intravitreal adeno-associated viral vectors and mouse models utilising the Cre/lox system restricted expression to populations dominated by bipolar cells or retinal ganglion cells and was compared with non-targeted delivery using the chicken beta actin (CBA) promoter. In summary, we found bipolar-targeted optogenetic tools produced faster kinetics and flatter intensity-response relationships compared with non-targeted or retinal-ganglion-cell-targeted hOPN4. Hence, optogenetic tools of both mammalian and microbial origins show advantages when targeted to bipolar cells. This demonstrates the advantage of bipolar-cell-targeted optogenetics for vision restoration in IRDs. We therefore developed a bipolar-cell-specific gene delivery system employing a compressed promoter with the potential for clinical translation.
spellingShingle Gilhooley, M
Lindner, M
Palumaa, T
Hughes, S
Peirson, S
Hankins, MW
A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title_full A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title_fullStr A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title_full_unstemmed A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title_short A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
title_sort systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration
work_keys_str_mv AT gilhooleym asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT lindnerm asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT palumaat asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT hughess asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT peirsons asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT hankinsmw asystematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT gilhooleym systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT lindnerm systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT palumaat systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT hughess systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT peirsons systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration
AT hankinsmw systematiccomparisonofoptogeneticapproachestovisualrestoration