Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain

<strong>Objective<br></strong> A mechanism-based clinical framework for spine-related pain differentiates (i) somatic referred pain, ii) heightened nerve mechanosensitivity, iii) radicular pain, iv) radiculopathy and mixed-pain. This study aimed to determine the reliability of prop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kapitza, C, Luedtke, K, Komenda, M, Kiefhaber, M, Schmid, AB, Ballenberger, N, Tampin, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023
_version_ 1811140942058487808
author Kapitza, C
Luedtke, K
Komenda, M
Kiefhaber, M
Schmid, AB
Ballenberger, N
Tampin, B
author_facet Kapitza, C
Luedtke, K
Komenda, M
Kiefhaber, M
Schmid, AB
Ballenberger, N
Tampin, B
author_sort Kapitza, C
collection OXFORD
description <strong>Objective<br></strong> A mechanism-based clinical framework for spine-related pain differentiates (i) somatic referred pain, ii) heightened nerve mechanosensitivity, iii) radicular pain, iv) radiculopathy and mixed-pain. This study aimed to determine the reliability of proposed framework. <br><strong> Method<br></strong> Fifty-one people with unilateral spine-related neck-arm pain were assessed and categorized by examiner-1. The classifications were compared to those made by two other examiners, based on written documentation of examiner-1. Cohens kappa was calculated between examiner-pairs; Fleiss Kappa among all examiners to assess agreement in classifying subgroups and entire framework. <br><strong> Result<br></strong> Inter-rater-reliability showed moderate to almost perfect reliability (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.96 (95% CI 0.87–1.0) to 1.0 (95% CI: 1.0–1.0), radicular pain: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.19–0.69) to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42–0.81), radiculopathy: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43–0.84) to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63–0.96) mixed-pain: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.21–0.81) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.48–0.94). There was almost perfect to moderate reliability among all examiners (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.97 (95% CI: 0.82–1.0), radicular pain: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.40–0.71), radiculopathy: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58–0.90), mixed-pain: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.47–0.79), entire framework: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57–0.71)). <br> Intra-rater-reliability showed substantial to almost perfect reliability (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87–1.0), radicular pain: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57–0.92), radiculopathy: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67–0.96), mixed-pain: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.60–1.0), entire framework: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.61–0.92). <br><strong> Conclusion<br></strong> Moderate to almost perfect reliability in subgrouping people with spine-related neck-arm pain and substantial reliability for entire framework support this classification's reliability.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:01:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c75e5d10-083a-4193-9b49-aae7a9ce24a9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:29:59Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c75e5d10-083a-4193-9b49-aae7a9ce24a92024-08-27T14:09:58ZInter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm painJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c75e5d10-083a-4193-9b49-aae7a9ce24a9EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2023Kapitza, CLuedtke, KKomenda, MKiefhaber, MSchmid, ABBallenberger, NTampin, B<strong>Objective<br></strong> A mechanism-based clinical framework for spine-related pain differentiates (i) somatic referred pain, ii) heightened nerve mechanosensitivity, iii) radicular pain, iv) radiculopathy and mixed-pain. This study aimed to determine the reliability of proposed framework. <br><strong> Method<br></strong> Fifty-one people with unilateral spine-related neck-arm pain were assessed and categorized by examiner-1. The classifications were compared to those made by two other examiners, based on written documentation of examiner-1. Cohens kappa was calculated between examiner-pairs; Fleiss Kappa among all examiners to assess agreement in classifying subgroups and entire framework. <br><strong> Result<br></strong> Inter-rater-reliability showed moderate to almost perfect reliability (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.96 (95% CI 0.87–1.0) to 1.0 (95% CI: 1.0–1.0), radicular pain: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.19–0.69) to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42–0.81), radiculopathy: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43–0.84) to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63–0.96) mixed-pain: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.21–0.81) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.48–0.94). There was almost perfect to moderate reliability among all examiners (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.97 (95% CI: 0.82–1.0), radicular pain: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.40–0.71), radiculopathy: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58–0.90), mixed-pain: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.47–0.79), entire framework: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57–0.71)). <br> Intra-rater-reliability showed substantial to almost perfect reliability (somatic: no variation, mechanosensitivity: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87–1.0), radicular pain: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57–0.92), radiculopathy: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67–0.96), mixed-pain: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.60–1.0), entire framework: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.61–0.92). <br><strong> Conclusion<br></strong> Moderate to almost perfect reliability in subgrouping people with spine-related neck-arm pain and substantial reliability for entire framework support this classification's reliability.
spellingShingle Kapitza, C
Luedtke, K
Komenda, M
Kiefhaber, M
Schmid, AB
Ballenberger, N
Tampin, B
Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title_full Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title_fullStr Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title_short Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain
title_sort inter and intra rater reliability of a clinical framework for spine related neck arm pain
work_keys_str_mv AT kapitzac interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT luedtkek interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT komendam interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT kiefhaberm interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT schmidab interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT ballenbergern interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain
AT tampinb interandintraraterreliabilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinerelatedneckarmpain