Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma has not been established. To clarify toxicities and outcomes of combined modality treatment, we performed a retrospective review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight consecu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gujral, D, Hawkins, M, Leonulli, BG, Ashley, S, Chau, I, Cunningham, D, Tait, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2011
_version_ 1797094260179206144
author Gujral, D
Hawkins, M
Leonulli, BG
Ashley, S
Chau, I
Cunningham, D
Tait, D
author_facet Gujral, D
Hawkins, M
Leonulli, BG
Ashley, S
Chau, I
Cunningham, D
Tait, D
author_sort Gujral, D
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: The benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma has not been established. To clarify toxicities and outcomes of combined modality treatment, we performed a retrospective review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were identified. Fifty-one patients had CRT, 17 had radiotherapy (RT). Fifty-eight received IC before RT. IC consisted of 4 cycles of platinum and fluoropyrimidines followed by CRT 54 Gy with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. Response to IC was assessed at 3 months and response to CRT at 3 months. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) are reported. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were men and 14 were women, with median age 72 years (range, 42-87 years). There were 29 stage II, 33 stage III, 4 stage IVa, and 2 stage IVb tumors. The response 3 months after completion of treatment was 39.6%. No grade 4 toxicity was reported, but 10/58 patients had grade 3 toxicity from IC. The median TTP and OS from RT for the entire cohort was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-18) and 16 months (95% CI, 5-27), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates from diagnosis were 73% and 47%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TTP or OS in patients who responded to IC compared with those who did not (median TTP 11 vs. 12 months, respectively; P = .8; median OS 15 vs. 14 months, respectively; P = .8). CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after CRT is comparable to unselected surgical series. Response to IC is not always an indicator of eventual outcome.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:11:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c802a85e-399d-4bef-8121-56f5515f62ad
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:11:36Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c802a85e-399d-4bef-8121-56f5515f62ad2022-03-27T06:49:15ZNonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c802a85e-399d-4bef-8121-56f5515f62adEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Gujral, DHawkins, MLeonulli, BGAshley, SChau, ICunningham, DTait, D BACKGROUND: The benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma has not been established. To clarify toxicities and outcomes of combined modality treatment, we performed a retrospective review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were identified. Fifty-one patients had CRT, 17 had radiotherapy (RT). Fifty-eight received IC before RT. IC consisted of 4 cycles of platinum and fluoropyrimidines followed by CRT 54 Gy with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. Response to IC was assessed at 3 months and response to CRT at 3 months. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) are reported. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were men and 14 were women, with median age 72 years (range, 42-87 years). There were 29 stage II, 33 stage III, 4 stage IVa, and 2 stage IVb tumors. The response 3 months after completion of treatment was 39.6%. No grade 4 toxicity was reported, but 10/58 patients had grade 3 toxicity from IC. The median TTP and OS from RT for the entire cohort was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-18) and 16 months (95% CI, 5-27), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates from diagnosis were 73% and 47%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TTP or OS in patients who responded to IC compared with those who did not (median TTP 11 vs. 12 months, respectively; P = .8; median OS 15 vs. 14 months, respectively; P = .8). CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after CRT is comparable to unselected surgical series. Response to IC is not always an indicator of eventual outcome.
spellingShingle Gujral, D
Hawkins, M
Leonulli, BG
Ashley, S
Chau, I
Cunningham, D
Tait, D
Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title_full Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title_fullStr Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title_full_unstemmed Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title_short Nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
title_sort nonsurgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma
work_keys_str_mv AT gujrald nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT hawkinsm nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT leonullibg nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT ashleys nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT chaui nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT cunninghamd nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT taitd nonsurgicalmanagementofesophagealadenocarcinoma