Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals

In this paper, I explore and probe Joseph Carens’ remarks, in his recent book The Ethics of Immigration, on the immigration status of foreign convicted criminals who have served their sentence, and who wish either to immigrate into our country or who are already here. Carens rejects deportation when...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabre, C
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1797094272055377920
author Fabre, C
author_facet Fabre, C
author_sort Fabre, C
collection OXFORD
description In this paper, I explore and probe Joseph Carens’ remarks, in his recent book The Ethics of Immigration, on the immigration status of foreign convicted criminals who have served their sentence, and who wish either to immigrate into our country or who are already here. Carens rejects deportation when it is not called for by considerations of national security, and agrees that considerations of public order can justify barring convicted foreign criminals from entering the country. I broadly agree with his arguments against deportation: my remarks in this respect are clari catory and exploratory as much as anything else. But (I argue) both his argument for open borders and his scepticism with respect to radical cosmopolitanism are in tension with his claim that past criminal convictions can act as a bar to entry.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:11:46Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c80ef7b5-1430-4230-bd92-26af3d945390
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:11:46Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c80ef7b5-1430-4230-bd92-26af3d9453902022-03-27T06:49:37ZEthics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminalsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c80ef7b5-1430-4230-bd92-26af3d945390Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Fabre, CIn this paper, I explore and probe Joseph Carens’ remarks, in his recent book The Ethics of Immigration, on the immigration status of foreign convicted criminals who have served their sentence, and who wish either to immigrate into our country or who are already here. Carens rejects deportation when it is not called for by considerations of national security, and agrees that considerations of public order can justify barring convicted foreign criminals from entering the country. I broadly agree with his arguments against deportation: my remarks in this respect are clari catory and exploratory as much as anything else. But (I argue) both his argument for open borders and his scepticism with respect to radical cosmopolitanism are in tension with his claim that past criminal convictions can act as a bar to entry.
spellingShingle Fabre, C
Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title_full Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title_fullStr Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title_full_unstemmed Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title_short Ethics of immigration: the issue of convicted criminals
title_sort ethics of immigration the issue of convicted criminals
work_keys_str_mv AT fabrec ethicsofimmigrationtheissueofconvictedcriminals