Beyond the last glacial maximum: island endemism is best explained by long-lasting archipelago configurations

<strong>Aim:</strong> To quantify the influence of past archipelago configuration on present-day insular biodiversity patterns, and to compare the role of long-lasting archipelago configurations over the Pleistocene to configurations of short duration such as at the Last Glacial Maximum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norder, S, Proios, K, Whittaker, R, Alonso, M, Borges, P, Borregaard, M, Cowie, R, Florens, F, de Frias Martins, A, Ibáñez, M, Kissling, W, de Nascimento, L, Otto, R, Parent, C, Rigal, F, Warren, B, Fernández-Palacios, J, van Loon, E, Triantis, K, Rijsdijk, K
Format: Journal article
Published: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Description
Summary:<strong>Aim:</strong> To quantify the influence of past archipelago configuration on present-day insular biodiversity patterns, and to compare the role of long-lasting archipelago configurations over the Pleistocene to configurations of short duration such as at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the present-day. <strong>Location:</strong> 53 volcanic oceanic islands from 12 archipelagos worldwide – Azores, Canary Islands, Cook Islands, Galápagos, Gulf of Guinea, Hawaii, Madeira, Mascarenes, Pitcairn, Revillagigedo, Samoa, and Tristan da Cunha. <strong>Time period:</strong> The last 800 Kyr, representing the nine most recent glacial¬–interglacial cycles. <strong>Major taxa studied:</strong> Land snails and angiosperms. <strong>Methods:</strong> Species richness data for land snails and angiosperms were compiled from existing literature and species checklists. We reconstructed archipelago configurations at the following sea-levels: the present-day high interglacial sea-level, the intermediate sea-levels that are representative of the Pleistocene, and the low sea-levels of the LGM. We fitted two alternative linear mixed models for each archipelago configuration on the number of single-island endemic, multiple-island endemic, and native non-endemic species. Model performance was assessed based on the goodness-of-fit of the full model, the variance explained by archipelago configuration, and model parsimony. <strong>Results:</strong> Single-island endemic richness in both taxonomic groups was best explained by intermediate palaeo-configuration (positively by area change, and negatively by palaeo-connectedness), whereas non-endemic native species richness was poorly explained by palaeo-configuration. Single-island endemic richness was better explained by intermediate archipelago configurations than by the archipelago configurations of the LGM or present-day. <strong>Main conclusions:</strong> Archipelago configurations at intermediate sea-levels – which are representative of the Pleistocene – have left a stronger imprint on single-island endemic richness patterns on volcanic oceanic islands than extreme archipelago configurations that persisted for only a few thousand years (such as the LGM). In understanding ecological and evolutionary dynamics of insular biota it is essential to consider longer-lasting environmental conditions, rather than extreme situations alone.