An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator.
BACKGROUND: To investigate organisational factors influencing the implementation challenges of redesigning services for people with long term conditions in three locations in England, using remote care (telehealth and telecare). METHODS: Case-studies of three sites forming the UK Department of Heal...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
_version_ | 1797094586488717312 |
---|---|
author | Hendy, J Chrysanthaki, T Barlow, J Knapp, M Rogers, A Sanders, C Bower, P Bowen, R Fitzpatrick, R Bardsley, M Newman, S |
author_facet | Hendy, J Chrysanthaki, T Barlow, J Knapp, M Rogers, A Sanders, C Bower, P Bowen, R Fitzpatrick, R Bardsley, M Newman, S |
author_sort | Hendy, J |
collection | OXFORD |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate organisational factors influencing the implementation challenges of redesigning services for people with long term conditions in three locations in England, using remote care (telehealth and telecare). METHODS: Case-studies of three sites forming the UK Department of Health's Whole Systems Demonstrator (WSD) Programme. Qualitative research techniques were used to obtain data from various sources, including semi-structured interviews, observation of meetings over the course programme and prior to its launch, and document review. Participants were managers and practitioners involved in the implementation of remote care services. RESULTS: The implementation of remote care was nested within a large pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), which formed a core element of the WSD programme. To produce robust benefits evidence, many aspect of the trial design could not be easily adapted to local circumstances. While remote care was successfully rolled-out, wider implementation lessons and levels of organisational learning across the sites were hindered by the requirements of the RCT. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a complex innovation such as remote care requires it to organically evolve, be responsive and adaptable to the local health and social care system, driven by support from front-line staff and management. This need for evolution was not always aligned with the imperative to gather robust benefits evidence. This tension needs to be resolved if government ambitions for the evidence-based scaling-up of remote care are to be realised. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:16:02Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:c9737b4f-6cbd-44d7-b84e-951be89ca48a |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:16:02Z |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:c9737b4f-6cbd-44d7-b84e-951be89ca48a2022-03-27T06:59:14ZAn organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c9737b4f-6cbd-44d7-b84e-951be89ca48aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2012Hendy, JChrysanthaki, TBarlow, JKnapp, MRogers, ASanders, CBower, PBowen, RFitzpatrick, RBardsley, MNewman, S BACKGROUND: To investigate organisational factors influencing the implementation challenges of redesigning services for people with long term conditions in three locations in England, using remote care (telehealth and telecare). METHODS: Case-studies of three sites forming the UK Department of Health's Whole Systems Demonstrator (WSD) Programme. Qualitative research techniques were used to obtain data from various sources, including semi-structured interviews, observation of meetings over the course programme and prior to its launch, and document review. Participants were managers and practitioners involved in the implementation of remote care services. RESULTS: The implementation of remote care was nested within a large pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), which formed a core element of the WSD programme. To produce robust benefits evidence, many aspect of the trial design could not be easily adapted to local circumstances. While remote care was successfully rolled-out, wider implementation lessons and levels of organisational learning across the sites were hindered by the requirements of the RCT. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a complex innovation such as remote care requires it to organically evolve, be responsive and adaptable to the local health and social care system, driven by support from front-line staff and management. This need for evolution was not always aligned with the imperative to gather robust benefits evidence. This tension needs to be resolved if government ambitions for the evidence-based scaling-up of remote care are to be realised. |
spellingShingle | Hendy, J Chrysanthaki, T Barlow, J Knapp, M Rogers, A Sanders, C Bower, P Bowen, R Fitzpatrick, R Bardsley, M Newman, S An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title | An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title_full | An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title_fullStr | An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title_full_unstemmed | An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title_short | An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. |
title_sort | organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth the whole systems demonstrator |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendyj anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT chrysanthakit anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT barlowj anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT knappm anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT rogersa anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT sandersc anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bowerp anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bowenr anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT fitzpatrickr anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bardsleym anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT newmans anorganisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT hendyj organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT chrysanthakit organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT barlowj organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT knappm organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT rogersa organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT sandersc organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bowerp organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bowenr organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT fitzpatrickr organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT bardsleym organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator AT newmans organisationalanalysisoftheimplementationoftelecareandtelehealththewholesystemsdemonstrator |