Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report
This research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS‐Plus, a stroke‐specific tablet‐based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty‐six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22‐mont...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811140066634891264 |
|---|---|
| author | Roberts, R Vohora, R Webb, SS Demeyere, N |
| author_facet | Roberts, R Vohora, R Webb, SS Demeyere, N |
| author_sort | Roberts, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS‐Plus, a stroke‐specific tablet‐based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty‐six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22‐month period and completed both screens. Overall, we found that the OCS‐Plus has good convergent validity and excellent sensitivity when compared with the MoCA. The OCS‐Plus is therefore of potential benefit to those seeking a sensitive screening tool. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:16:04Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:c9b461f3-f986-4857-8dba-9c57638ced8d |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:16:04Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:c9b461f3-f986-4857-8dba-9c57638ced8d2024-07-20T14:42:12ZValidating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief reportJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c9b461f3-f986-4857-8dba-9c57638ced8dEnglishJisc Publications RouterWiley2024Roberts, RVohora, RWebb, SSDemeyere, NThis research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS‐Plus, a stroke‐specific tablet‐based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty‐six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22‐month period and completed both screens. Overall, we found that the OCS‐Plus has good convergent validity and excellent sensitivity when compared with the MoCA. The OCS‐Plus is therefore of potential benefit to those seeking a sensitive screening tool. |
| spellingShingle | Roberts, R Vohora, R Webb, SS Demeyere, N Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title | Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title_full | Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title_fullStr | Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title_short | Validating the OCS‐Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report |
| title_sort | validating the ocs plus against a clinical standard a brief report |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsr validatingtheocsplusagainstaclinicalstandardabriefreport AT vohorar validatingtheocsplusagainstaclinicalstandardabriefreport AT webbss validatingtheocsplusagainstaclinicalstandardabriefreport AT demeyeren validatingtheocsplusagainstaclinicalstandardabriefreport |