Adaptation and genetic conflict
<p>Genes that increase organism fitness can come to prominence as a result of natural selection, leading to the appearance of organismal design, or ‘adaptation’. However, genes that compromise organism fitness can also come to prominence if they are able to secure a selfish propagation advanta...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: |
_version_ | 1826296498377195520 |
---|---|
author | Scott, TW |
author2 | West, S |
author_facet | West, S Scott, TW |
author_sort | Scott, TW |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <p>Genes that increase organism fitness can come to prominence as a result of natural selection, leading to the appearance of organismal design, or ‘adaptation’. However, genes that compromise organism fitness can also come to prominence if they are able to secure a selfish propagation advantage from doing so. Such genes are called ‘selfish genetic elements’. I consider the consequences of selfish genetic elements for organismal design (adaptation). First, I consider a fungus in which – strikingly – different nuclei in the same individual may be genetically different from each other (‘chimera’). I show how such diversity could be maintained by natural selection, and what consequences this has on the organism. Second, I consider, in general and in a range of specific biological scenarios, whether selfish genetic elements might be expected to gain control of organism traits. I show that the ‘parliament of genes’ is generally effective in suppressing selfish genetic elements, meaning organism design is generally preserved. Third, I ask whether animals can, in principle, evolve to recognise kin via genetic cues. I show they often can, as long as genetic kin discrimination is favoured, over indiscriminate cooperation and indiscriminate defection, at the individual level (it maximises individual fitness).</p>
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:17:16Z |
format | Thesis |
id | oxford-uuid:c9ce77bd-afcf-434a-b3d3-4d02746dd13c |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:17:16Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:c9ce77bd-afcf-434a-b3d3-4d02746dd13c2022-03-27T07:02:27ZAdaptation and genetic conflictThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:c9ce77bd-afcf-434a-b3d3-4d02746dd13cPopulation geneticsSocial evolutionEvolutionary theoryEnglishHyrax Deposit2019Scott, TWWest, SGriffin, AÚbeda, F<p>Genes that increase organism fitness can come to prominence as a result of natural selection, leading to the appearance of organismal design, or ‘adaptation’. However, genes that compromise organism fitness can also come to prominence if they are able to secure a selfish propagation advantage from doing so. Such genes are called ‘selfish genetic elements’. I consider the consequences of selfish genetic elements for organismal design (adaptation). First, I consider a fungus in which – strikingly – different nuclei in the same individual may be genetically different from each other (‘chimera’). I show how such diversity could be maintained by natural selection, and what consequences this has on the organism. Second, I consider, in general and in a range of specific biological scenarios, whether selfish genetic elements might be expected to gain control of organism traits. I show that the ‘parliament of genes’ is generally effective in suppressing selfish genetic elements, meaning organism design is generally preserved. Third, I ask whether animals can, in principle, evolve to recognise kin via genetic cues. I show they often can, as long as genetic kin discrimination is favoured, over indiscriminate cooperation and indiscriminate defection, at the individual level (it maximises individual fitness).</p> |
spellingShingle | Population genetics Social evolution Evolutionary theory Scott, TW Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title | Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title_full | Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title_fullStr | Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title_full_unstemmed | Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title_short | Adaptation and genetic conflict |
title_sort | adaptation and genetic conflict |
topic | Population genetics Social evolution Evolutionary theory |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scotttw adaptationandgeneticconflict |