Should Christians do Natural Theology?
Natural theology is enjoying something of a resurgence at present but this article seeks to question its place in Christian philosophy and theology. Antecedent natural theology accepts that it is necessary for Christian beliefs to be rationally warranted. Romans 1:18ff. is often cited in favour of n...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Μορφή: | Journal article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Έκδοση: |
2010
|
| _version_ | 1826296571606597632 |
|---|---|
| author | Moore, A |
| author_facet | Moore, A |
| author_sort | Moore, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Natural theology is enjoying something of a resurgence at present but this article seeks to question its place in Christian philosophy and theology. Antecedent natural theology accepts that it is necessary for Christian beliefs to be rationally warranted. Romans 1:18ff. is often cited in favour of natural theology. However, examination of this text shows that Paul argues here on the basis of a prior revelation. Not only does he not endorse natural theology but what he does say implies that arguments for a God's existence are not likely to lead to the God revealed in Jesus Christ. Such arguments are in any case tainted by the noetic effects of sin. It is therefore not clear that these arguments lead to the God of Christian belief who calls us to simple discipleship. Consequent natural theology holds that Christians are under an epistemological obligation to their surrounding culture to show that they are reflectively rational. But the arguments put up for this by Michael Sudduth ignore theological arguments which should bear on Christian epistemology. Apart from God's self-revelation we find ourselves sceptics, and natural theology is unable to overcome this. Historical research has shown the damaging effects that arguing from nature has had on Christian theology. So, for both theological and historical reasons, Christians need not accept the epistemological obligations imposed on them by unbelievers which lead them to do natural theology. © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2010. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:18:24Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:ca2e72d7-ecb2-4432-817b-076b024ab03a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:18:24Z |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ca2e72d7-ecb2-4432-817b-076b024ab03a2022-03-27T07:05:33ZShould Christians do Natural Theology?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ca2e72d7-ecb2-4432-817b-076b024ab03aEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Moore, ANatural theology is enjoying something of a resurgence at present but this article seeks to question its place in Christian philosophy and theology. Antecedent natural theology accepts that it is necessary for Christian beliefs to be rationally warranted. Romans 1:18ff. is often cited in favour of natural theology. However, examination of this text shows that Paul argues here on the basis of a prior revelation. Not only does he not endorse natural theology but what he does say implies that arguments for a God's existence are not likely to lead to the God revealed in Jesus Christ. Such arguments are in any case tainted by the noetic effects of sin. It is therefore not clear that these arguments lead to the God of Christian belief who calls us to simple discipleship. Consequent natural theology holds that Christians are under an epistemological obligation to their surrounding culture to show that they are reflectively rational. But the arguments put up for this by Michael Sudduth ignore theological arguments which should bear on Christian epistemology. Apart from God's self-revelation we find ourselves sceptics, and natural theology is unable to overcome this. Historical research has shown the damaging effects that arguing from nature has had on Christian theology. So, for both theological and historical reasons, Christians need not accept the epistemological obligations imposed on them by unbelievers which lead them to do natural theology. © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2010. |
| spellingShingle | Moore, A Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title | Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title_full | Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title_fullStr | Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title_short | Should Christians do Natural Theology? |
| title_sort | should christians do natural theology |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moorea shouldchristiansdonaturaltheology |