On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become

In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argued that certain theoretical strains in contemporary legal philosophy are 'epistemologically bankrupt', in virtue of their reliance on misguided argumentative devices: analysing concepts, suc...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính: Dickson, J
Định dạng: Journal article
Ngôn ngữ:English
Được phát hành: 2011
_version_ 1826296603116306432
author Dickson, J
author_facet Dickson, J
author_sort Dickson, J
collection OXFORD
description In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argued that certain theoretical strains in contemporary legal philosophy are 'epistemologically bankrupt', in virtue of their reliance on misguided argumentative devices: analysing concepts, such as the concepts of law and of authority; and doing so by appealing to intuitions regarding the correct way to understand the concepts in question. In response to this state of affairs, Leiter advocates that jurisprudence ought to attempt to catch-up with 'naturalistic' developments which have influenced the direction of other branches of philosophy - such as epistemology, philosophy of mind, and moral philosophy - in the last few decades. This article offers a critical analysis of some of Leiter's proposals for what Jurisprudence should become, in light of his views on the relevance of naturalism for this discipline. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:18:53Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ca55a0ee-e87a-441e-90b2-a0782f28cecc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:18:53Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ca55a0ee-e87a-441e-90b2-a0782f28cecc2022-03-27T07:06:39ZOn Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should BecomeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ca55a0ee-e87a-441e-90b2-a0782f28ceccEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Dickson, JIn a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argued that certain theoretical strains in contemporary legal philosophy are 'epistemologically bankrupt', in virtue of their reliance on misguided argumentative devices: analysing concepts, such as the concepts of law and of authority; and doing so by appealing to intuitions regarding the correct way to understand the concepts in question. In response to this state of affairs, Leiter advocates that jurisprudence ought to attempt to catch-up with 'naturalistic' developments which have influenced the direction of other branches of philosophy - such as epistemology, philosophy of mind, and moral philosophy - in the last few decades. This article offers a critical analysis of some of Leiter's proposals for what Jurisprudence should become, in light of his views on the relevance of naturalism for this discipline. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
spellingShingle Dickson, J
On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title_full On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title_fullStr On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title_full_unstemmed On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title_short On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become
title_sort on naturalizing jurisprudence some comments on brian leiter s view of what jurisprudence should become
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksonj onnaturalizingjurisprudencesomecommentsonbrianleitersviewofwhatjurisprudenceshouldbecome