Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition.
The relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage t...
| Автори: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Journal article |
| Мова: | English |
| Опубліковано: |
2008
|
| _version_ | 1826296636300591104 |
|---|---|
| author | Mitchell, A Browning, P Wilson, C Baxter, MG Gaffan, D |
| author_facet | Mitchell, A Browning, P Wilson, C Baxter, MG Gaffan, D |
| author_sort | Mitchell, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage to discrete regions of cortex leads to the opposite pattern of impairments. Nevertheless, damage to the medial diencephalon in humans is associated with both retrograde and anterograde amnesia. In the present study, we sought to reconcile this by assessing retention as well as subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning. Rhesus monkeys learned 300 unique scene discriminations preoperatively, and retention was assessed in a preoperative and postoperative one-trial retrieval test. Combined bilateral subcortical lesions to the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus and fornix impaired postoperative retention of the preoperatively acquired information. In addition, subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning were also impaired. This contrasts with the effects of a discrete lesion to just one of these structures, after which retention is intact in both cases. Discrete bilateral ablations to the entorhinal cortex impaired retention but had no effect on new learning. Combined with previous work from our laboratory, these results support the hypothesis that subcortical damage has a relatively greater effect on new learning, and cortical damage has a relatively greater effect on retention. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that retrograde amnesia occurs as a result of subcortical damage only if it is widespread, leading to an extensive disruption of cortical functioning. Damage of this nature may account for dense amnesia. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:19:24Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:ca7f42c7-d080-491e-9dbe-dcc02bd03f3a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:19:24Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ca7f42c7-d080-491e-9dbe-dcc02bd03f3a2022-03-27T07:07:54ZDissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ca7f42c7-d080-491e-9dbe-dcc02bd03f3aEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Mitchell, ABrowning, PWilson, CBaxter, MGGaffan, DThe relationship between anterograde and retrograde amnesia remains unclear. Previous data from both clinical neuropsychology and monkey lesion studies suggest that damage to discrete subcortical structures leads to a relatively greater degree of anterograde than retrograde amnesia, whereas damage to discrete regions of cortex leads to the opposite pattern of impairments. Nevertheless, damage to the medial diencephalon in humans is associated with both retrograde and anterograde amnesia. In the present study, we sought to reconcile this by assessing retention as well as subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning. Rhesus monkeys learned 300 unique scene discriminations preoperatively, and retention was assessed in a preoperative and postoperative one-trial retrieval test. Combined bilateral subcortical lesions to the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus and fornix impaired postoperative retention of the preoperatively acquired information. In addition, subsequent relearning and new postoperative learning were also impaired. This contrasts with the effects of a discrete lesion to just one of these structures, after which retention is intact in both cases. Discrete bilateral ablations to the entorhinal cortex impaired retention but had no effect on new learning. Combined with previous work from our laboratory, these results support the hypothesis that subcortical damage has a relatively greater effect on new learning, and cortical damage has a relatively greater effect on retention. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that retrograde amnesia occurs as a result of subcortical damage only if it is widespread, leading to an extensive disruption of cortical functioning. Damage of this nature may account for dense amnesia. |
| spellingShingle | Mitchell, A Browning, P Wilson, C Baxter, MG Gaffan, D Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title | Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title_full | Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title_fullStr | Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title_short | Dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition. |
| title_sort | dissociable roles for cortical and subcortical structures in memory retrieval and acquisition |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mitchella dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition AT browningp dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition AT wilsonc dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition AT baxtermg dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition AT gaffand dissociablerolesforcorticalandsubcorticalstructuresinmemoryretrievalandacquisition |