A word about evidence: ‘rapid reviews’ or ‘restricted reviews’?
In recent years, ‘rapid reviews’ have become increasingly popular. Here members of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine suggest that such reviews have been misnamed and should instead be called ‘restricted reviews’.
Egile Nagusiak: | Aronson, J, Heneghan, C, Mahtani, K, Plüddemann, A |
---|---|
Formatua: | Journal article |
Hizkuntza: | English |
Argitaratua: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Antzeko izenburuak
-
Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews
nork: Plüddemann, A, et al.
Argitaratua: (2018) -
Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine
nork: Nunan, D, et al.
Argitaratua: (2017) -
What evidence affects clinical practice? An analysis of Evidence-Based Medicine commentaries
nork: Coombs, C, et al.
Argitaratua: (2017) -
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.
nork: Heneghan, C, et al.
Argitaratua: (2017) -
Transvaginal mesh failure: lessons for regulation of implantable devices.
nork: Heneghan, C, et al.
Argitaratua: (2017)