Reply to Øystein Linnebo and Stewart Shapiro
In reply to Linnebo, I defend my analysis of Tait's argument against the use of classical logic in set theory, and make some preliminary comments on Linnebo's new argument for the same conclusion. I then turn to Shapiro's discussion of intuitionistic analysis and of Smooth Infinitesim...
Main Author: | Rumfitt, I |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Routledge
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Øystein Linnebo’s “Thin” objects: The problem of reference
by: Burian, Veronika V.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Thin objects: an abstractionist account, by Øystein Linnebo
by: Studd, J
Published: (2019) -
Varieties of Logic, by Stewart Shapiro
by: Studd, J
Published: (2017) -
Reply to Florio and Shapiro
by: Linnebo, O., et al.
Published: (2018) -
Linnebo's abstractionism and the bad company problem
by: Studd, JP
Published: (2021)