Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Poor reporting compromises the reliability and clinical value of prognostic tumour marker studies. We review articles to assess the reporting of patients and events using REMARK guidelines, at the time of guideline publication. METHODS: We sampled 50 prognostic tumour marker studies fro...
Main Authors: | Mallett, S, Timmer, A, Sauerbrei, W, Altman, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Similar Items
-
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
by: Mallett, S, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
by: Sekula, P, et al.
Published: (2017) -
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005) -
REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).
by: McShane, L, et al.
Published: (2005)