Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences

We study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular ti...

Popoln opis

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Elkind, E, Markakis, E, Obraztsova, S, Skowron, P
Format: Conference item
Jezik:English
Izdano: ACM 2016
_version_ 1826296836171759616
author Elkind, E
Markakis, E
Obraztsova, S
Skowron, P
author_facet Elkind, E
Markakis, E
Obraztsova, S
Skowron, P
author_sort Elkind, E
collection OXFORD
description We study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular tie-breaking rules (lexicographic, random-candidate, and random-voter) and two types of voters' attitude: lazy voters, who prefer to abstain when their vote cannot affect the election outcome, and truth-biased voters, who prefer to vote truthfully in such cases. Elkind et al. [15] have shown that for most of these combinations of tie-breaking rules and voters' attitudes finding a Nash equilibrium is NP-hard; in contrast, we demonstrate that in almost all cases this problem is tractable for preferences that are single-peaked or single-crossing, under mild technical assumptions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:22:28Z
format Conference item
id oxford-uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:22:28Z
publishDate 2016
publisher ACM
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01c2022-03-27T07:15:13ZComplexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferencesConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01cEnglishSymplectic ElementsACM2016Elkind, EMarkakis, EObraztsova, SSkowron, PWe study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular tie-breaking rules (lexicographic, random-candidate, and random-voter) and two types of voters' attitude: lazy voters, who prefer to abstain when their vote cannot affect the election outcome, and truth-biased voters, who prefer to vote truthfully in such cases. Elkind et al. [15] have shown that for most of these combinations of tie-breaking rules and voters' attitudes finding a Nash equilibrium is NP-hard; in contrast, we demonstrate that in almost all cases this problem is tractable for preferences that are single-peaked or single-crossing, under mild technical assumptions.
spellingShingle Elkind, E
Markakis, E
Obraztsova, S
Skowron, P
Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title_full Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title_fullStr Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title_full_unstemmed Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title_short Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
title_sort complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
work_keys_str_mv AT elkinde complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences
AT markakise complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences
AT obraztsovas complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences
AT skowronp complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences