Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences
We study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular ti...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference item |
Jezik: | English |
Izdano: |
ACM
2016
|
_version_ | 1826296836171759616 |
---|---|
author | Elkind, E Markakis, E Obraztsova, S Skowron, P |
author_facet | Elkind, E Markakis, E Obraztsova, S Skowron, P |
author_sort | Elkind, E |
collection | OXFORD |
description | We study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular tie-breaking rules (lexicographic, random-candidate, and random-voter) and two types of voters' attitude: lazy voters, who prefer to abstain when their vote cannot affect the election outcome, and truth-biased voters, who prefer to vote truthfully in such cases. Elkind et al. [15] have shown that for most of these combinations of tie-breaking rules and voters' attitudes finding a Nash equilibrium is NP-hard; in contrast, we demonstrate that in almost all cases this problem is tractable for preferences that are single-peaked or single-crossing, under mild technical assumptions. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:22:28Z |
format | Conference item |
id | oxford-uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01c |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:22:28Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | ACM |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01c2022-03-27T07:15:13ZComplexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferencesConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:cb7cfd26-43eb-4a04-a20e-5e9668bef01cEnglishSymplectic ElementsACM2016Elkind, EMarkakis, EObraztsova, SSkowron, PWe study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular tie-breaking rules (lexicographic, random-candidate, and random-voter) and two types of voters' attitude: lazy voters, who prefer to abstain when their vote cannot affect the election outcome, and truth-biased voters, who prefer to vote truthfully in such cases. Elkind et al. [15] have shown that for most of these combinations of tie-breaking rules and voters' attitudes finding a Nash equilibrium is NP-hard; in contrast, we demonstrate that in almost all cases this problem is tractable for preferences that are single-peaked or single-crossing, under mild technical assumptions. |
spellingShingle | Elkind, E Markakis, E Obraztsova, S Skowron, P Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title | Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title_full | Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title_fullStr | Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title_short | Complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
title_sort | complexity of finding equilibria of plurality voting under structured preferences |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkinde complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences AT markakise complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences AT obraztsovas complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences AT skowronp complexityoffindingequilibriaofpluralityvotingunderstructuredpreferences |