Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.

We explored whether information processed subconsciously in blindsight is qualitatively different from normal conscious processing. On each trial the blindsight patient GY was presented with a square-wave grating either in an upper or lower quadrant of his visual field and was asked to report the op...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Persaud, N, Cowey, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797095087905177600
author Persaud, N
Cowey, A
author_facet Persaud, N
Cowey, A
author_sort Persaud, N
collection OXFORD
description We explored whether information processed subconsciously in blindsight is qualitatively different from normal conscious processing. On each trial the blindsight patient GY was presented with a square-wave grating either in an upper or lower quadrant of his visual field and was asked to report the opposite of its location (e.g. to say 'Up' if it was in the lower quadrant). We found that while GY was able to follow these exclusion instructions in his normal field, he tended to erroneously respond with the real location when the grating appeared in his blind field. Remarkably, his error rate actually increased with increasing grating contrast in his blind field. The interpretation of these results does not rely on subjective reports and thus cannot be criticized on the grounds that subjective reports are unreliable. We conclude that blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:23:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:cbacd32f-8e39-47a7-884b-8e22414fba3f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:23:03Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:cbacd32f-8e39-47a7-884b-8e22414fba3f2022-03-27T07:16:28ZBlindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:cbacd32f-8e39-47a7-884b-8e22414fba3fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Persaud, NCowey, AWe explored whether information processed subconsciously in blindsight is qualitatively different from normal conscious processing. On each trial the blindsight patient GY was presented with a square-wave grating either in an upper or lower quadrant of his visual field and was asked to report the opposite of its location (e.g. to say 'Up' if it was in the lower quadrant). We found that while GY was able to follow these exclusion instructions in his normal field, he tended to erroneously respond with the real location when the grating appeared in his blind field. Remarkably, his error rate actually increased with increasing grating contrast in his blind field. The interpretation of these results does not rely on subjective reports and thus cannot be criticized on the grounds that subjective reports are unreliable. We conclude that blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision.
spellingShingle Persaud, N
Cowey, A
Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title_full Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title_fullStr Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title_full_unstemmed Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title_short Blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision: evidence from an exclusion task.
title_sort blindsight is unlike normal conscious vision evidence from an exclusion task
work_keys_str_mv AT persaudn blindsightisunlikenormalconsciousvisionevidencefromanexclusiontask
AT coweya blindsightisunlikenormalconsciousvisionevidencefromanexclusiontask