Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods
Institutions, if unjust, ought to be reformed or even abolished. This radical Rawlsian thought leads to the question of whether the family ought to be abolished, given its negative impact on the very possibility of delivering equality of life chances. In this article, we address questions regarding...
Asıl Yazarlar: | , |
---|---|
Materyal Türü: | Journal article |
Dil: | English |
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
_version_ | 1826311156710506496 |
---|---|
author | Munoz-Dardé, V Martin, MGF |
author_facet | Munoz-Dardé, V Martin, MGF |
author_sort | Munoz-Dardé, V |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Institutions, if unjust, ought to be reformed or even abolished. This radical Rawlsian thought leads to the question of whether the family ought to be abolished, given its negative impact on the very possibility of delivering equality of life chances. In this article, we address questions regarding the justice of the family, and of marriage, and reflect on rights, equality, and the provision of social goods by institutions. There is a temptation to justify our social institutions in terms which highlight their universal accessibility and benefits. But we may best understand the claim of some of our most important institutions where we recognize that they are forms of social good which may legitimately benefit some without having to benefit all. Their abolition is unjustified where there is sufficient value in them given our collective needs that it is unreasonable for some to refuse the means to maintain and promote these goods. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:02:41Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:cbb5f912-4551-4a21-8206-ed68e3652423 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:02:41Z |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:cbb5f912-4551-4a21-8206-ed68e36524232023-10-11T16:32:44ZFamily and marriage: institutions and the need for social goodsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:cbb5f912-4551-4a21-8206-ed68e3652423EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2023Munoz-Dardé, VMartin, MGFInstitutions, if unjust, ought to be reformed or even abolished. This radical Rawlsian thought leads to the question of whether the family ought to be abolished, given its negative impact on the very possibility of delivering equality of life chances. In this article, we address questions regarding the justice of the family, and of marriage, and reflect on rights, equality, and the provision of social goods by institutions. There is a temptation to justify our social institutions in terms which highlight their universal accessibility and benefits. But we may best understand the claim of some of our most important institutions where we recognize that they are forms of social good which may legitimately benefit some without having to benefit all. Their abolition is unjustified where there is sufficient value in them given our collective needs that it is unreasonable for some to refuse the means to maintain and promote these goods. |
spellingShingle | Munoz-Dardé, V Martin, MGF Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title | Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title_full | Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title_fullStr | Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title_full_unstemmed | Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title_short | Family and marriage: institutions and the need for social goods |
title_sort | family and marriage institutions and the need for social goods |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozdardev familyandmarriageinstitutionsandtheneedforsocialgoods AT martinmgf familyandmarriageinstitutionsandtheneedforsocialgoods |