Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination

Members of racial and sexual minorities often live in the fear of arbitrary interference from others—rogue police officers or sexual harassers. Are they unfree by dint of believing they are unfree? I draw on the republican theory of freedom—according to which we are unfree if we are subjected to a r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laborde, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2024
_version_ 1811141199318220800
author Laborde, C
author_facet Laborde, C
author_sort Laborde, C
collection OXFORD
description Members of racial and sexual minorities often live in the fear of arbitrary interference from others—rogue police officers or sexual harassers. Are they unfree by dint of believing they are unfree? I draw on the republican theory of freedom—according to which we are unfree if we are subjected to a risk of arbitrary interference—to offer a qualified positive answer. I clarify the role of probabilistic judgements about risk in republican political theory. I argue that under specific circumstances, diagnoses of republican freedom can be indexed to a certain belief about probability—what it is warranted for someone to believe in light of their distinctive epistemic perspective.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:34:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ccf57eea-5cd5-4e8b-8f85-dd17eab08549
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:34:05Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ccf57eea-5cd5-4e8b-8f85-dd17eab085492024-09-05T10:47:52ZBeing free, feeling free: race, gender and republican dominationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ccf57eea-5cd5-4e8b-8f85-dd17eab08549EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2024Laborde, CMembers of racial and sexual minorities often live in the fear of arbitrary interference from others—rogue police officers or sexual harassers. Are they unfree by dint of believing they are unfree? I draw on the republican theory of freedom—according to which we are unfree if we are subjected to a risk of arbitrary interference—to offer a qualified positive answer. I clarify the role of probabilistic judgements about risk in republican political theory. I argue that under specific circumstances, diagnoses of republican freedom can be indexed to a certain belief about probability—what it is warranted for someone to believe in light of their distinctive epistemic perspective.
spellingShingle Laborde, C
Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title_full Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title_fullStr Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title_full_unstemmed Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title_short Being free, feeling free: race, gender and republican domination
title_sort being free feeling free race gender and republican domination
work_keys_str_mv AT labordec beingfreefeelingfreeracegenderandrepublicandomination