DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER
Methods of interpretation of the cone pressuremeter in clay and in sand are discussed. A method of analysis for the test in clay had previously been compared with results in stiff overconsolidated clay, and is compared here with results in soft clay at Bothkennar. Both shear strength and shear modul...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference item |
Published: |
1993
|
_version_ | 1797095535035809792 |
---|---|
author | Houlsby, G Nutt, N |
author_facet | Houlsby, G Nutt, N |
author_sort | Houlsby, G |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Methods of interpretation of the cone pressuremeter in clay and in sand are discussed. A method of analysis for the test in clay had previously been compared with results in stiff overconsolidated clay, and is compared here with results in soft clay at Bothkennar. Both shear strength and shear modulus can be measured successfully, and a discussion is presented of comparisons of shear modulus measured by different techniques. In sand interpretation methods are based on correlations determined from calibration chamber tests. The correlations can be used to estimate horizontal stress and relative density, and unload-reload loops can be used to determine stiffness. -from Authors |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:29:13Z |
format | Conference item |
id | oxford-uuid:cdbf9122-5c16-46b1-bd1f-3a13ef6724ec |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:29:13Z |
publishDate | 1993 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:cdbf9122-5c16-46b1-bd1f-3a13ef6724ec2022-03-27T07:30:49ZDEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETERConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:cdbf9122-5c16-46b1-bd1f-3a13ef6724ecSymplectic Elements at Oxford1993Houlsby, GNutt, NMethods of interpretation of the cone pressuremeter in clay and in sand are discussed. A method of analysis for the test in clay had previously been compared with results in stiff overconsolidated clay, and is compared here with results in soft clay at Bothkennar. Both shear strength and shear modulus can be measured successfully, and a discussion is presented of comparisons of shear modulus measured by different techniques. In sand interpretation methods are based on correlations determined from calibration chamber tests. The correlations can be used to estimate horizontal stress and relative density, and unload-reload loops can be used to determine stiffness. -from Authors |
spellingShingle | Houlsby, G Nutt, N DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title_full | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title_fullStr | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title_full_unstemmed | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title_short | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONE PRESSUREMETER |
title_sort | development of the cone pressuremeter |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houlsbyg developmentoftheconepressuremeter AT nuttn developmentoftheconepressuremeter |