Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials.

Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials.

Show other versions (1)

OBJECTIVE: To explore how patients' treatment preferences were expressed and justified during recruitment to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and how they influenced participation and treatment decisions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative analysis of audio recordings of recruitment appoi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Mills, N, Donovan, J, Wade, J, Hamdy, F, Neal, D, Lane, J
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2011

Similar Items

Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

Addressing patient treatment preferences at trial recruitment.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Factors associated with trial recruitment, preferences, and treatments received were elucidated in a comprehensive cohort study.
by: Donovan, JL, et al.
Published: (2019)

It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials.
by: Wade, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: randomisation to clinical trials may solve dilemma of treatment choice in prostate cancer.
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2003)

Understanding and improving recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Qualitative research approaches.
by: Elliott, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

The protect trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer and associated molecular and genetic epidemiology studies
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

THE PROTECT TRIAL - EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENTS FOR CLINICALLY LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

The ProtecT trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer (ISRCTN20141297)
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trial.
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

Prostate cancer detection in men aged 45-49 years in the UK protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) trial
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Factors distinguishing general practitioners who more readily participated in a large randomized trial were identified.
by: Down, L, et al.
Published: (2009)

Media and internet impact on randomisation rates and treatment acceptability in the protect study
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2008)

The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation
by: Rooshenas, L, et al.
Published: (2018)

Decision-making about PSA testing and prostate biopsies: a qualitative study embedded in a primary care randomised trial.
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2008)

Treatment preference and recruitment to pediatric RCTs: A systematic review
by: L. Beasant, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis
by: Nicola Farrar, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Preference-based versus randomized controlled trial in prostate cancer survivors: Comparison of recruitment, adherence, attrition, and clinical outcomes
by: Shabbir M. H. Alibhai, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

The protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Advanced cases found through a UK screening study
by: Neal, D, et al.
Published: (2006)

Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2003)

Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: Qualitative synthesis of clinicians' practices across six randomised controlled trials.
by: Rooshenas, L, et al.
Published: (2016)

Facilitating trial recruitment: A qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial
by: Phelps, E, et al.
Published: (2019)

Detection of prostate cancer in unselected young men: prospective cohort nested within a randomised controlled trial.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

The protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Evaluating screening and treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer in the UK
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials
by: Rick, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

Association of diabetes mellitus with prostate cancer: nested case-control study (Prostate testing for cancer and treatment study).
by: Turner, E, et al.
Published: (2011)

Difficulties in recruitment for a randomized controlled trial involving hysterosalpingography
by: Helmerhorst Frans M, et al.
Published: (2006-06-01)

Prediction of RECRUITment In randomized clinical Trials (RECRUIT-IT)-rationale and design for an international collaborative study.
by: Kasenda, B, et al.
Published: (2020)

A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study).
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2006)

MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER MAKE POSITIVE DIETARY CHANGES FOLLOWING TREATMENT IN A RANDOMISED TRIAL: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

ASSOCIATIONS OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION WITH LOCALIZED AND ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY NESTED WITHIN THE UK POPULATION-BASED PROTECT (PROSTATE TESTING FOR CANCER AND TREATMENT) STUDY
by: Collin, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

An evaluation of the effectiveness of recruitment methods: the staying well after depression randomized controlled trial.
by: Krusche, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis
by: Pepijn Al, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

The microbiome of infants recruited to a randomised placebo-controlled probiotic trial (PiPS Trial)
by: Millar, M, et al.
Published: (2017)

Characteristics of men responding to an invitation to undergo testing for prostate cancer as part of a randomised trial.
by: Walsh, E, et al.
Published: (2016)

Recruitment to the "breast-activity and healthy eating after diagnosis" (B-AHEAD) randomized controlled trial
by: Pegington, M, et al.
Published: (2017)