The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis

Interoception concerns the perception of the body’s internal state. Despite the importance of this ability for health and aspects of higher-order cognition, its measurement remains problematic. Most studies of interoception employ one of two tasks: the heartbeat counting or heartbeat discrimination...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors: Hickman, L, Seyedsalehi, A, Cook, JL, Bird, G, Murphy, J
Formato: Journal article
Idioma:English
Publicado em: Elsevier 2020
_version_ 1826297376456835072
author Hickman, L
Seyedsalehi, A
Cook, JL
Bird, G
Murphy, J
author_facet Hickman, L
Seyedsalehi, A
Cook, JL
Bird, G
Murphy, J
author_sort Hickman, L
collection OXFORD
description Interoception concerns the perception of the body’s internal state. Despite the importance of this ability for health and aspects of higher-order cognition, its measurement remains problematic. Most studies of interoception employ one of two tasks: the heartbeat counting or heartbeat discrimination task. These tasks are thought to index common abilities, an assertion often used to justify the use of a single measure of cardiac interoception. However, mixed findings regarding the relationship between performance on these tasks raises the question of whether they can be used interchangeably to assess interoceptive accuracy, confidence and awareness (‘metacognition’). The present study employed a meta-analytical approach to assess the association between these tasks. Pooled findings from 22 studies revealed a small relationship between accuracy scores on the measures. Additional analyses demonstrated a moderate relationship between confidence ratings but no association between measures of interoceptive awareness. These findings question the interchangeable use of the two tasks.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:30:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ce3312ba-4ffc-470c-9f17-45e174bbf71e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:30:40Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ce3312ba-4ffc-470c-9f17-45e174bbf71e2022-03-27T07:34:05ZThe relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ce3312ba-4ffc-470c-9f17-45e174bbf71eEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2020Hickman, LSeyedsalehi, ACook, JLBird, GMurphy, JInteroception concerns the perception of the body’s internal state. Despite the importance of this ability for health and aspects of higher-order cognition, its measurement remains problematic. Most studies of interoception employ one of two tasks: the heartbeat counting or heartbeat discrimination task. These tasks are thought to index common abilities, an assertion often used to justify the use of a single measure of cardiac interoception. However, mixed findings regarding the relationship between performance on these tasks raises the question of whether they can be used interchangeably to assess interoceptive accuracy, confidence and awareness (‘metacognition’). The present study employed a meta-analytical approach to assess the association between these tasks. Pooled findings from 22 studies revealed a small relationship between accuracy scores on the measures. Additional analyses demonstrated a moderate relationship between confidence ratings but no association between measures of interoceptive awareness. These findings question the interchangeable use of the two tasks.
spellingShingle Hickman, L
Seyedsalehi, A
Cook, JL
Bird, G
Murphy, J
The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title_full The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title_short The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis
title_sort relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination a meta analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT hickmanl therelationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT seyedsalehia therelationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT cookjl therelationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT birdg therelationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT murphyj therelationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT hickmanl relationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT seyedsalehia relationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT cookjl relationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT birdg relationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis
AT murphyj relationshipbetweenheartbeatcountingandheartbeatdiscriminationametaanalysis