Raqeeb, Haastrup and Evans: seeking consistency through a distributive justice-based, approach to limitation of treatment in the context of dispute
When is life-sustaining treatment not in the best interests of a minimally conscious child? This is an extremely difficult question that incites seemingly intractable debate. And yet, it is the question courts in England and Wales have set out to answer in disputes about appropriate medical treatmen...
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Cameron, J, Savulescu, J, Wilkinson, DJC |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment
حسب: Wilkinson, DJC, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018) -
Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
حسب: Wilkinson, D, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018) -
Re‐evaluating ‘best interests’ in the wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors
حسب: Auckland, C, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020) -
Positive or negative? Consistency and inconsistency in claims of conscience
حسب: Wilkinson, DJC
منشور في: (2020) -
In Conversation with: JCMS Editors Past and Present: Maxine David speaks to Simon Bulmer and Toni Haastrup
حسب: UACES
منشور في: (2017-12-01)