Raqeeb, Haastrup and Evans: seeking consistency through a distributive justice-based, approach to limitation of treatment in the context of dispute
When is life-sustaining treatment not in the best interests of a minimally conscious child? This is an extremely difficult question that incites seemingly intractable debate. And yet, it is the question courts in England and Wales have set out to answer in disputes about appropriate medical treatmen...
Autori principali: | Cameron, J, Savulescu, J, Wilkinson, DJC |
---|---|
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Documenti analoghi
Documenti analoghi
-
Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment
di: Wilkinson, DJC, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018) -
Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
di: Wilkinson, D, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018) -
Re‐evaluating ‘best interests’ in the wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors
di: Auckland, C, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020) -
Positive or negative? Consistency and inconsistency in claims of conscience
di: Wilkinson, DJC
Pubblicazione: (2020) -
In Conversation with: JCMS Editors Past and Present: Maxine David speaks to Simon Bulmer and Toni Haastrup
di: UACES
Pubblicazione: (2017-12-01)