Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.

Self-esteem, typically measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), is one of the most widely studied constructs in psychology. Nevertheless, there is broad agreement that a simple unidimensional factor model, consistent with the original design and typical application in applied research, doe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marsh, H, Scalas, L, Nagengast, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797095925532852224
author Marsh, H
Scalas, L
Nagengast, B
author_facet Marsh, H
Scalas, L
Nagengast, B
author_sort Marsh, H
collection OXFORD
description Self-esteem, typically measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), is one of the most widely studied constructs in psychology. Nevertheless, there is broad agreement that a simple unidimensional factor model, consistent with the original design and typical application in applied research, does not provide an adequate explanation of RSE responses. However, there is no clear agreement about what alternative model is most appropriate-or even a clear rationale for how to test competing interpretations. Three alternative interpretations exist: (a) 2 substantively important trait factors (positive and negative self-esteem), (b) 1 trait factor and ephemeral method artifacts associated with positively or negatively worded items, or (c) 1 trait factor and stable response-style method factors associated with item wording. We have posited 8 alternative models and structural equation model tests based on longitudinal data (4 waves of data across 8 years with a large, representative sample of adolescents). Longitudinal models provide no support for the unidimensional model, undermine support for the 2-factor model, and clearly refute claims that wording effects are ephemeral, but they provide good support for models positing 1 substantive (self-esteem) factor and response-style method factors that are stable over time. This longitudinal methodological approach has not only resolved these long-standing issues in self-esteem research but also has broad applicability to most psychological assessments based on self-reports with a mix of positively and negatively worded items.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:34:55Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:cf990ae9-5ed3-45ce-bfe3-57f52c0cf6b0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:34:55Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:cf990ae9-5ed3-45ce-bfe3-57f52c0cf6b02022-03-27T07:43:48ZLongitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:cf990ae9-5ed3-45ce-bfe3-57f52c0cf6b0EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Marsh, HScalas, LNagengast, BSelf-esteem, typically measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), is one of the most widely studied constructs in psychology. Nevertheless, there is broad agreement that a simple unidimensional factor model, consistent with the original design and typical application in applied research, does not provide an adequate explanation of RSE responses. However, there is no clear agreement about what alternative model is most appropriate-or even a clear rationale for how to test competing interpretations. Three alternative interpretations exist: (a) 2 substantively important trait factors (positive and negative self-esteem), (b) 1 trait factor and ephemeral method artifacts associated with positively or negatively worded items, or (c) 1 trait factor and stable response-style method factors associated with item wording. We have posited 8 alternative models and structural equation model tests based on longitudinal data (4 waves of data across 8 years with a large, representative sample of adolescents). Longitudinal models provide no support for the unidimensional model, undermine support for the 2-factor model, and clearly refute claims that wording effects are ephemeral, but they provide good support for models positing 1 substantive (self-esteem) factor and response-style method factors that are stable over time. This longitudinal methodological approach has not only resolved these long-standing issues in self-esteem research but also has broad applicability to most psychological assessments based on self-reports with a mix of positively and negatively worded items.
spellingShingle Marsh, H
Scalas, L
Nagengast, B
Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title_full Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title_fullStr Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title_short Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
title_sort longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the rosenberg self esteem scale traits ephemeral artifacts and stable response styles
work_keys_str_mv AT marshh longitudinaltestsofcompetingfactorstructuresfortherosenbergselfesteemscaletraitsephemeralartifactsandstableresponsestyles
AT scalasl longitudinaltestsofcompetingfactorstructuresfortherosenbergselfesteemscaletraitsephemeralartifactsandstableresponsestyles
AT nagengastb longitudinaltestsofcompetingfactorstructuresfortherosenbergselfesteemscaletraitsephemeralartifactsandstableresponsestyles