Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance

The relationship between Israel and the diaspora has been marked by mutual accommodation. The diaspora has come to accept the fact that Israel is not exempt from the problems and pathologies of states and societies; and Israel has acknowledged the continuation of the diaspora as a centre of Jewish l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Safran, W
Format: Working paper
Published: International Migration Institute 2012
_version_ 1797096066504458240
author Safran, W
author_facet Safran, W
author_sort Safran, W
collection OXFORD
description The relationship between Israel and the diaspora has been marked by mutual accommodation. The diaspora has come to accept the fact that Israel is not exempt from the problems and pathologies of states and societies; and Israel has acknowledged the continuation of the diaspora as a centre of Jewish life. Both sides are subject to illusions. Jews in the diaspora believe that Israel will be better supported by their hostland’s political right rather than its left; that Israel can be saved, despite itself, by a kind of 'tough love’ bestowed upon it by the diaspora or its hostland governments; and that Jewish identity and survival, based on an autonomous and largely secular culture, can be assured regardless of whether Israel exists or not. Israel’s illusions are that it can be 'like other nations’; that it can replicate in short order the civic nations that France and the United States became after many generations; and that it must 'de-ethnicise’ and de-Judaise to become acceptable to its neighbours.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:36:47Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:d032e9ca-d882-4b0c-bc0b-b9bd19ce7e5a
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:36:47Z
publishDate 2012
publisher International Migration Institute
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d032e9ca-d882-4b0c-bc0b-b9bd19ce7e5a2022-03-27T07:48:18ZIsrael and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonanceWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:d032e9ca-d882-4b0c-bc0b-b9bd19ce7e5aBulk import via SwordSymplectic ElementsInternational Migration Institute2012Safran, WThe relationship between Israel and the diaspora has been marked by mutual accommodation. The diaspora has come to accept the fact that Israel is not exempt from the problems and pathologies of states and societies; and Israel has acknowledged the continuation of the diaspora as a centre of Jewish life. Both sides are subject to illusions. Jews in the diaspora believe that Israel will be better supported by their hostland’s political right rather than its left; that Israel can be saved, despite itself, by a kind of 'tough love’ bestowed upon it by the diaspora or its hostland governments; and that Jewish identity and survival, based on an autonomous and largely secular culture, can be assured regardless of whether Israel exists or not. Israel’s illusions are that it can be 'like other nations’; that it can replicate in short order the civic nations that France and the United States became after many generations; and that it must 'de-ethnicise’ and de-Judaise to become acceptable to its neighbours.
spellingShingle Safran, W
Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title_full Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title_fullStr Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title_full_unstemmed Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title_short Israel and the diaspora: problems of cognitive dissonance
title_sort israel and the diaspora problems of cognitive dissonance
work_keys_str_mv AT safranw israelandthediasporaproblemsofcognitivedissonance