Intuitionism disproved?
Perennial philosophers' hopes are unlikely victims of swift, natural deduction. Yet anti-realism has been thought one. Not hoping for anti-realism myself I here show it, lest it be underestimated, to survive the following argument, adapted from W. D.Hart ('Access and Inference', Proce...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Blackwell Publishing
1982
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | Perennial philosophers' hopes are unlikely victims of swift, natural deduction. Yet anti-realism has been thought one. Not hoping for anti-realism myself I here show it, lest it be underestimated, to survive the following argument, adapted from W. D.Hart ('Access and Inference', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, sup. vol. LIII (1979) pp. 156, 164-5; he credits first publication to Fitch). |
|---|