10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply

We agree with Klotz and Kibel that the lack of significant differences in survival among the three treatments makes a comparison between radiotherapy and surgery unwise. The predetermined power calculation for the ProtecT trial estimated a prostate-cancer mortality rate of 10% at a median of 10 year...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Hamdy, F, Donovan, J, Neal, D
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Massachusetts Medical Society 2017
_version_ 1826297920605913088
author Hamdy, F
Donovan, J
Neal, D
author_facet Hamdy, F
Donovan, J
Neal, D
author_sort Hamdy, F
collection OXFORD
description We agree with Klotz and Kibel that the lack of significant differences in survival among the three treatments makes a comparison between radiotherapy and surgery unwise. The predetermined power calculation for the ProtecT trial estimated a prostate-cancer mortality rate of 10% at a median of 10 years, and because the observed rate was 1%, longer follow-up is required to evaluate differences. We agree that the ProtecT findings should not be interpreted as a case against active surveillance. The similar rates of survival in the three groups, the lower rate of symptoms in the active-monitoring group than in the radical-treatment groups, and the finding that 80% of the men in the active-monitoring group remained progression- free provide evidence to support this option.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:38:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d0f49142-eda6-4c2f-a387-93e82c31e183
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:38:58Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d0f49142-eda6-4c2f-a387-93e82c31e1832022-03-27T07:53:39Z10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' replyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d0f49142-eda6-4c2f-a387-93e82c31e183Symplectic Elements at OxfordMassachusetts Medical Society2017Hamdy, FDonovan, JNeal, DWe agree with Klotz and Kibel that the lack of significant differences in survival among the three treatments makes a comparison between radiotherapy and surgery unwise. The predetermined power calculation for the ProtecT trial estimated a prostate-cancer mortality rate of 10% at a median of 10 years, and because the observed rate was 1%, longer follow-up is required to evaluate differences. We agree that the ProtecT findings should not be interpreted as a case against active surveillance. The similar rates of survival in the three groups, the lower rate of symptoms in the active-monitoring group than in the radical-treatment groups, and the finding that 80% of the men in the active-monitoring group remained progression- free provide evidence to support this option.
spellingShingle Hamdy, F
Donovan, J
Neal, D
10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title 10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title_full 10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title_fullStr 10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title_full_unstemmed 10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title_short 10-year outcomes in localized prostate cancer: Authors' reply
title_sort 10 year outcomes in localized prostate cancer authors reply
work_keys_str_mv AT hamdyf 10yearoutcomesinlocalizedprostatecancerauthorsreply
AT donovanj 10yearoutcomesinlocalizedprostatecancerauthorsreply
AT neald 10yearoutcomesinlocalizedprostatecancerauthorsreply