Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage

<p>This thesis consists of 3 studies:</p> <p>1. Determination of the minimal important difference (MID) of the visual analogue scale for dyspnoea (VASD):</p> <p>Determining the MID of the VASD is essential to interpret the results of trials in patients with malignant p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mishra, EK
Other Authors: Stradling, J
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
_version_ 1797096253455073280
author Mishra, EK
author2 Stradling, J
author_facet Stradling, J
Mishra, EK
author_sort Mishra, EK
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis consists of 3 studies:</p> <p>1. Determination of the minimal important difference (MID) of the visual analogue scale for dyspnoea (VASD):</p> <p>Determining the MID of the VASD is essential to interpret the results of trials in patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Patients undergoing a pleural procedure assessed the change in their VASD and the degree of change in their symptoms on a Likert scale. The mean VASD in patients experiencing a ‘small but just worthwhile’ decrease in their symptoms is the MID for the VASD and was found to be 22mm (95% CI 16 - 27mm).</p> <p>2. Development of a thoracic ultrasound septation score (TUSS):</p> <p>A TUSS is important for objectively assessing the degree of septation within a pleural effusion. An iterative process was used to demonstrate that degree of septation predicts clinical outcome, to identify candidate factors for inclusion in a TUSS and to determine which factors predicted the degree of septation. The final TUSS consisted of an assessment of the degree of homogeneity of septation distribution and number of septations at the most septated area.</p> <p>3. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) versus standard care for relieving dyspnoea in patients with MPEs: the TIME2 randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p> <p>The objective of this unblinded RCT was to determine whether IPCs are more effective than chest drains and talc pleurodesis at relieving dyspnoea in patients with MPEs. 106 patients were randomised to either IPC or standard care in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was daily VASD over 42 days post intervention. Dyspnoea improved in both groups with no significant difference in mean dyspnoea in the first 42 days (mean score: IPC 25mm (95% CI 19 – 30), standard care 24mm (95% CI 19 – 29).</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:39:14Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:d1121dbf-5568-47a6-bfed-8526a481c6ca
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:39:14Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d1121dbf-5568-47a6-bfed-8526a481c6ca2022-03-27T07:54:15ZAssessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainageThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:d1121dbf-5568-47a6-bfed-8526a481c6caRespiratory medicineEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2013Mishra, EKStradling, JMaskell, N<p>This thesis consists of 3 studies:</p> <p>1. Determination of the minimal important difference (MID) of the visual analogue scale for dyspnoea (VASD):</p> <p>Determining the MID of the VASD is essential to interpret the results of trials in patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Patients undergoing a pleural procedure assessed the change in their VASD and the degree of change in their symptoms on a Likert scale. The mean VASD in patients experiencing a ‘small but just worthwhile’ decrease in their symptoms is the MID for the VASD and was found to be 22mm (95% CI 16 - 27mm).</p> <p>2. Development of a thoracic ultrasound septation score (TUSS):</p> <p>A TUSS is important for objectively assessing the degree of septation within a pleural effusion. An iterative process was used to demonstrate that degree of septation predicts clinical outcome, to identify candidate factors for inclusion in a TUSS and to determine which factors predicted the degree of septation. The final TUSS consisted of an assessment of the degree of homogeneity of septation distribution and number of septations at the most septated area.</p> <p>3. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) versus standard care for relieving dyspnoea in patients with MPEs: the TIME2 randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p> <p>The objective of this unblinded RCT was to determine whether IPCs are more effective than chest drains and talc pleurodesis at relieving dyspnoea in patients with MPEs. 106 patients were randomised to either IPC or standard care in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was daily VASD over 42 days post intervention. Dyspnoea improved in both groups with no significant difference in mean dyspnoea in the first 42 days (mean score: IPC 25mm (95% CI 19 – 30), standard care 24mm (95% CI 19 – 29).</p>
spellingShingle Respiratory medicine
Mishra, EK
Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title_full Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title_fullStr Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title_short Assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions: visual analogue scale, ultrasound and drainage
title_sort assessment and treatment of malignant pleural effusions visual analogue scale ultrasound and drainage
topic Respiratory medicine
work_keys_str_mv AT mishraek assessmentandtreatmentofmalignantpleuraleffusionsvisualanaloguescaleultrasoundanddrainage