[Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study]
We conducted this pilot cadaver study to investigate whether the use of a navigation system during minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to more consistent results than the conventional hand-guided technique. We describe the accuracy of implant positioning in using standard ins...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference item |
| Published: |
2005
|
| _version_ | 1797096269532889088 |
|---|---|
| author | Aldinger, P Gill, H Schlegel, U Schneider, M Clauss, M Goodfellow, J Murray, D Breusch, S |
| author_facet | Aldinger, P Gill, H Schlegel, U Schneider, M Clauss, M Goodfellow, J Murray, D Breusch, S |
| author_sort | Aldinger, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | We conducted this pilot cadaver study to investigate whether the use of a navigation system during minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to more consistent results than the conventional hand-guided technique. We describe the accuracy of implant positioning in using standard instrumentation and computer navigation. Radiographic assessment showed that accurate component placement was achieved using both methods. These results were not statistically significant. The computer navigated femoral component placement without intramedullary (IM) rod was as accurate as the conventional method with IM rod. The study showed that computer navigation can produce accurate results even without an intramedullary rod. Image guidance can maintain the accuracy of the standard instrumentation and enhance 3D vision and the intraoperative orientation of the surgeon. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:39:28Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:d11ef00e-5b57-4ecb-9eea-91cca74b9214 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:39:28Z |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:d11ef00e-5b57-4ecb-9eea-91cca74b92142022-03-27T07:54:49Z[Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study]Conference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:d11ef00e-5b57-4ecb-9eea-91cca74b9214Symplectic Elements at Oxford2005Aldinger, PGill, HSchlegel, USchneider, MClauss, MGoodfellow, JMurray, DBreusch, SWe conducted this pilot cadaver study to investigate whether the use of a navigation system during minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to more consistent results than the conventional hand-guided technique. We describe the accuracy of implant positioning in using standard instrumentation and computer navigation. Radiographic assessment showed that accurate component placement was achieved using both methods. These results were not statistically significant. The computer navigated femoral component placement without intramedullary (IM) rod was as accurate as the conventional method with IM rod. The study showed that computer navigation can produce accurate results even without an intramedullary rod. Image guidance can maintain the accuracy of the standard instrumentation and enhance 3D vision and the intraoperative orientation of the surgeon. |
| spellingShingle | Aldinger, P Gill, H Schlegel, U Schneider, M Clauss, M Goodfellow, J Murray, D Breusch, S [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title | [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title_full | [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title_fullStr | [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title_full_unstemmed | [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title_short | [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study] |
| title_sort | is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a pilot cadaver study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aldingerp iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT gillh iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT schlegelu iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT schneiderm iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT claussm iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT goodfellowj iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT murrayd iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy AT breuschs iscomputernavigationausefultoolinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotcadaverstudy |