| Résumé: | Background The preservation fluids most commonly used for renal allograft preservation in the UK are University of Wisconsin Solution (UW, £120/litre) and Marshall’s Solution (Hyper-osmolar Citrate, £10/litre). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of deceased donor renal allografts preserved with these fluids using data from the UK national transplant registry. Methods Data regarding transplants performed between January 1st 2005 and December 31st 2008 was analysed (n=5,027 kidneys). Kidneys from Donation after Brain Death (DBD) and Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) were included. Following univariate analysis, multivariate logistic and linear regression models were fitted for adult recipients of first grafts (n=3,703 kidneys). Results Marshall’s Solution was associated with longer cold ischaemic time, older donors, kidney-only donors, donors with hypertension and DBD (all p<0.01). After adjusting for confounding, the choice of preservation fluid was not associated with the risk of PNF (OR=0.82, 95%CI 0.46-1.46, p=0.50), DGF (OR=1.22, 95%CI 0.96-1.56, p=0.11), acute rejection (OR=0.95, 95%CI 0.76-1.19, p=0.63), renal function at one year (Coefficient =0.97, 95%CI 0.91-1.04, p=0.41 ) or graft survival (DBD HR=0.71, 95%CI 0.46-1.10, p=12, DCD HR=0.99, 95%CI 0.58-1.73, p=1.00). Conclusions Marshall’s solution has been used for the preservation of large numbers of kidneys in the UK. It is associated with transplant outcomes that are equivalent to those with UW Solution. Thus on the basis of this analysis and cost a strong case can be made for the continued use of Marshall’s Solution as a preferred fluid for renal allograft preservation.
|
|---|