Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition

Different kinds of "gender gap" have been reported in different walks of the scientific life, almost always favouring male scientists over females. In this work, for the first time, we present a large-scale empirical analysis to ask whether female scientists with the same level of scientif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schellekens, M, Holstege, F, Yasseri, T
Format: Journal article
Published: Cornell University 2019
_version_ 1826298152017199104
author Schellekens, M
Holstege, F
Yasseri, T
author_facet Schellekens, M
Holstege, F
Yasseri, T
author_sort Schellekens, M
collection OXFORD
description Different kinds of "gender gap" have been reported in different walks of the scientific life, almost always favouring male scientists over females. In this work, for the first time, we present a large-scale empirical analysis to ask whether female scientists with the same level of scientific accomplishment are as likely as males to be recognised. We particularly focus on Wikipedia, the open online encyclopedia that its open nature allows us to have a proxy of community recognition. We calculate the probability of appearing on Wikipedia as a scientist for both male and female scholars in three different fields. We find that women in Physics, Economics and Philosophy are considerable less likely than men to be recognised on Wikipedia across all levels of achievement.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:42:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d21f54d8-43f2-43e2-836d-85ba044df662
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:42:30Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Cornell University
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d21f54d8-43f2-43e2-836d-85ba044df6622022-03-27T08:01:38ZFemale scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognitionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d21f54d8-43f2-43e2-836d-85ba044df662Symplectic Elements at OxfordCornell University2019Schellekens, MHolstege, FYasseri, TDifferent kinds of "gender gap" have been reported in different walks of the scientific life, almost always favouring male scientists over females. In this work, for the first time, we present a large-scale empirical analysis to ask whether female scientists with the same level of scientific accomplishment are as likely as males to be recognised. We particularly focus on Wikipedia, the open online encyclopedia that its open nature allows us to have a proxy of community recognition. We calculate the probability of appearing on Wikipedia as a scientist for both male and female scholars in three different fields. We find that women in Physics, Economics and Philosophy are considerable less likely than men to be recognised on Wikipedia across all levels of achievement.
spellingShingle Schellekens, M
Holstege, F
Yasseri, T
Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title_full Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title_fullStr Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title_full_unstemmed Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title_short Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
title_sort female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition
work_keys_str_mv AT schellekensm femalescholarsneedtoachievemoreforequalpublicrecognition
AT holstegef femalescholarsneedtoachievemoreforequalpublicrecognition
AT yasserit femalescholarsneedtoachievemoreforequalpublicrecognition