Research inefficiencies in external validation studies of the Framingham Wilson coronary heart disease risk rule: A systematic review
Background: External validation studies create evidence about a clinical prediction rule’s (CPR’s) generalizability by evaluating and updating the CPR in populations different from those used in the derivation, and also by contributing to estimating its overall performance when meta-analysed in a sy...
Auteurs principaux: | Ban, J, Abel, L, Stevens, R, Perera, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science
2024
|
Documents similaires
-
Framingham risk equations underestimate coronary heart disease risk in diabetes.
par: Stevens, R, et autres
Publié: (2005) -
Predictors for independent external validation of cardiovascular risk clinical prediction rules: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses
par: Ban, J, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Evaluating SCORE and Framingham fatal coronary heart disease risk equations using UKPDS data
par: Coleman, R, et autres
Publié: (2004) -
Predictors for independent external validation of cardiovascular risk clinical prediction rules: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses
par: Jong-Wook Ban, et autres
Publié: (2018-02-01) -
Research waste and inefficiency in cardiovascular prediction rule development: exploration of causes and implications
par: Ban, J-W
Publié: (2021)