Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping

<p><b>Objective:</b> Bacterial biofilms represent a major challenge for effective antibiotic therapy as they confer physical and functional changes that protect bacteria from their surrounding environment. In this work, focused ultrasound in combination with cavitation nuclei was u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keller, SB, Gray, MD, Lyons, B, Cleveland, RO, Stride, E, Coussios, CC
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024
_version_ 1811141298954960896
author Keller, SB
Gray, MD
Lyons, B
Cleveland, RO
Stride, E
Coussios, CC
author_facet Keller, SB
Gray, MD
Lyons, B
Cleveland, RO
Stride, E
Coussios, CC
author_sort Keller, SB
collection OXFORD
description <p><b>Objective:</b> Bacterial biofilms represent a major challenge for effective antibiotic therapy as they confer physical and functional changes that protect bacteria from their surrounding environment. In this work, focused ultrasound in combination with cavitation nuclei was used to disrupt biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, both of which are on the World Health Organization’s priority list for new antimicrobial research. </p> <p><b>Approach:</b> Single species biofilms were exposed to ultrasound (0.5 MHz centre frequency, 0.5-1.5 MPa peak rarefactional pressure, 200 cycle pulses, 5 Hz repetition frequency, 30 s duration), in the presence of two different types of cavitation nuclei. Quantitative passive acoustic mapping (PAM) was used to monitor cavitation emissions during treatment using a calibrated linear array. </p> <p><b>Main Results:</b> It was observed that the cumulative energy of acoustic emissions during treatment was positively correlated with biofilm disruption, with differences between bacterial species attributed to differences in biofilm morphology. PCaN provided increased biofilm reduction compared to microbubbles due in large part to their persistence over the duration of ultrasound exposure. There was also good correlation between the spatial distribution of cavitation as characterized by PAM and the extent of biofilm disruption observed with microscopy. </p> <p><b>Significance:</b> Collectively, the results from this work indicate the potential broad applicability of cavitation for eliminating biofilms of priority pathogens and the opportunity presented by Passive Acoustic Mapping for real-time monitoring of antimicrobial processes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:35:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d30f1569-b023-4692-8b61-258862a3f4ff
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:35:40Z
publishDate 2024
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d30f1569-b023-4692-8b61-258862a3f4ff2024-09-16T15:41:44ZQuantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mappingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d30f1569-b023-4692-8b61-258862a3f4ffEnglishSymplectic ElementsIOP Publishing2024Keller, SBGray, MDLyons, BCleveland, ROStride, ECoussios, CC<p><b>Objective:</b> Bacterial biofilms represent a major challenge for effective antibiotic therapy as they confer physical and functional changes that protect bacteria from their surrounding environment. In this work, focused ultrasound in combination with cavitation nuclei was used to disrupt biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, both of which are on the World Health Organization’s priority list for new antimicrobial research. </p> <p><b>Approach:</b> Single species biofilms were exposed to ultrasound (0.5 MHz centre frequency, 0.5-1.5 MPa peak rarefactional pressure, 200 cycle pulses, 5 Hz repetition frequency, 30 s duration), in the presence of two different types of cavitation nuclei. Quantitative passive acoustic mapping (PAM) was used to monitor cavitation emissions during treatment using a calibrated linear array. </p> <p><b>Main Results:</b> It was observed that the cumulative energy of acoustic emissions during treatment was positively correlated with biofilm disruption, with differences between bacterial species attributed to differences in biofilm morphology. PCaN provided increased biofilm reduction compared to microbubbles due in large part to their persistence over the duration of ultrasound exposure. There was also good correlation between the spatial distribution of cavitation as characterized by PAM and the extent of biofilm disruption observed with microscopy. </p> <p><b>Significance:</b> Collectively, the results from this work indicate the potential broad applicability of cavitation for eliminating biofilms of priority pathogens and the opportunity presented by Passive Acoustic Mapping for real-time monitoring of antimicrobial processes.</p>
spellingShingle Keller, SB
Gray, MD
Lyons, B
Cleveland, RO
Stride, E
Coussios, CC
Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title_full Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title_short Quantitative evaluation of anti-biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
title_sort quantitative evaluation of anti biofilm cavitation activity seeded from microbubbles or protein cavitation nuclei by passive acoustic mapping
work_keys_str_mv AT kellersb quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT graymd quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT lyonsb quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT clevelandro quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT stridee quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping
AT coussioscc quantitativeevaluationofantibiofilmcavitationactivityseededfrommicrobubblesorproteincavitationnucleibypassiveacousticmapping