Blinding is better than masking [11]

Blinding is better than masking [11]

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Schulz, K, Altman, D, Moher, D
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2007

Similar Items

Masking or blinding? Blinding is better than masking
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2007)

Turning a blind eye: testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2004)

CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
by: Ioannidis, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

Turning a blind eye [3] (multiple letters)
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2004)

Two face masks are better than one: congruency effects in face matching
by: Alejandro J. Estudillo, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2002)

CONSORT 2010 comments.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

Improving the reporting of randomised trials: The CONSORT Statement andbeyond
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2003)

The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2005)

CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2003)

CONSORT statement requires closer examination.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

Protocols, probity, and publication.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2009)

Reporting the clinical importance of randomized controlled trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

Allocation concealment in clinical trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2002)

CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

Interpreting the number needed to treat.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2002)

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2010)

In response: CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2005)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

The consort statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2001)

Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reporting power calculations is important
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials RESPONSE
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

Ethical issues in the reporting of clinical trials - Reply
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2001)

Erratum: CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2011)