Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market

A prominent defence of a market in organs from living donors says that if we truly care about people in poverty, we should allow them to sell their organs. The argument is that if poor vendors would have voluntarily decided to sell their organs in a free market, then prohibiting them from selling ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rippon, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2014
_version_ 1797096871013908480
author Rippon, S
author_facet Rippon, S
author_sort Rippon, S
collection OXFORD
description A prominent defence of a market in organs from living donors says that if we truly care about people in poverty, we should allow them to sell their organs. The argument is that if poor vendors would have voluntarily decided to sell their organs in a free market, then prohibiting them from selling makes them even worse off, at least from their own perspective, and that it would be unconscionably paternalistic to substitute our judgements for individuals' own judgements about what would be best for them. The author shows that this 'Laissez- Choisir Argument' for organ selling rests on a mistake. This is because the claim that it would be better for people in poverty to sell their organs if given the option is consistent with the claim that it would be even better for them to not have the option at all. The upshot is that objections to an organ market need not be at all paternalistic, since we need not accept that the absence of a market makes those in poverty any worse off, even from their own point of view. The author goes on to argue that there are strong theoretical and empirical reasons for believing that people in poverty would in fact be harmed by the introduction of a market for live donor organs and that the harm constitutes sufficient grounds for prohibiting a market.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:47:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d3e2a304-cd63-4338-a687-8dc43322c1f7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:47:42Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d3e2a304-cd63-4338-a687-8dc43322c1f72022-03-27T08:14:22ZImposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ marketJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d3e2a304-cd63-4338-a687-8dc43322c1f7EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Rippon, SA prominent defence of a market in organs from living donors says that if we truly care about people in poverty, we should allow them to sell their organs. The argument is that if poor vendors would have voluntarily decided to sell their organs in a free market, then prohibiting them from selling makes them even worse off, at least from their own perspective, and that it would be unconscionably paternalistic to substitute our judgements for individuals' own judgements about what would be best for them. The author shows that this 'Laissez- Choisir Argument' for organ selling rests on a mistake. This is because the claim that it would be better for people in poverty to sell their organs if given the option is consistent with the claim that it would be even better for them to not have the option at all. The upshot is that objections to an organ market need not be at all paternalistic, since we need not accept that the absence of a market makes those in poverty any worse off, even from their own point of view. The author goes on to argue that there are strong theoretical and empirical reasons for believing that people in poverty would in fact be harmed by the introduction of a market for live donor organs and that the harm constitutes sufficient grounds for prohibiting a market.
spellingShingle Rippon, S
Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title_full Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title_fullStr Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title_full_unstemmed Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title_short Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
title_sort imposing options on people in poverty the harm of a live donor organ market
work_keys_str_mv AT rippons imposingoptionsonpeopleinpovertytheharmofalivedonororganmarket