Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?

The assumption held by most Septuagint scholars that Origen compiled the <em>Hexapla</em> for a text-critical or apologetic use is challenged. A third possibility - that Origen's motivations were more exegetical - is considered. This third view has not received the attention it dese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Law, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2008
Subjects:
_version_ 1797096880788733952
author Law, T
author_facet Law, T
author_sort Law, T
collection OXFORD
description The assumption held by most Septuagint scholars that Origen compiled the <em>Hexapla</em> for a text-critical or apologetic use is challenged. A third possibility - that Origen's motivations were more exegetical - is considered. This third view has not received the attention it deserves, even though it has been raised several times in the past few decades. Here I examine Origen's life and thought with particular attention to his approach to and use of Scripture. After discussing the content and structure of the <em>Hexapla</em>, I evaluate the two theories that are most often used to explain the genesis of the <em>Hexapla</em>, and attempt to show their insufficiency alone to account for Origen's work. The third proposal is then tested to see if an exegetical motivation fits more harmoniously with Origen's attitude towards Scripture.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:47:52Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d3ec8d7d-7643-4b4f-8b45-39aba93e6fd0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:47:52Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d3ec8d7d-7643-4b4f-8b45-39aba93e6fd02022-03-27T08:14:44ZOrigen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d3ec8d7d-7643-4b4f-8b45-39aba93e6fd0Christianity and Christian spiritualityBiblical studiesTheology and ReligionJudaismEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetOxford University Press2008Law, TThe assumption held by most Septuagint scholars that Origen compiled the <em>Hexapla</em> for a text-critical or apologetic use is challenged. A third possibility - that Origen's motivations were more exegetical - is considered. This third view has not received the attention it deserves, even though it has been raised several times in the past few decades. Here I examine Origen's life and thought with particular attention to his approach to and use of Scripture. After discussing the content and structure of the <em>Hexapla</em>, I evaluate the two theories that are most often used to explain the genesis of the <em>Hexapla</em>, and attempt to show their insufficiency alone to account for Origen's work. The third proposal is then tested to see if an exegetical motivation fits more harmoniously with Origen's attitude towards Scripture.
spellingShingle Christianity and Christian spirituality
Biblical studies
Theology and Religion
Judaism
Law, T
Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title_full Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title_fullStr Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title_full_unstemmed Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title_short Origen's parallel bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
title_sort origen s parallel bible textual criticism apologetics or exegesis
topic Christianity and Christian spirituality
Biblical studies
Theology and Religion
Judaism
work_keys_str_mv AT lawt origensparallelbibletextualcriticismapologeticsorexegesis