The ethics of germline gene editing

Germline Gene Editing (GGE) has enormous potential both as a research tool and a therapeutic intervention. While other types of gene editing are relatively uncontroversial, GGE has been strongly resisted. In this article, we analyse the ethical arguments for and against pursuing GGE by allowing and...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Gyngell, C, Douglas, T, Savulescu, J
Aineistotyyppi: Journal article
Julkaistu: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1826298619902296064
author Gyngell, C
Douglas, T
Savulescu, J
author_facet Gyngell, C
Douglas, T
Savulescu, J
author_sort Gyngell, C
collection OXFORD
description Germline Gene Editing (GGE) has enormous potential both as a research tool and a therapeutic intervention. While other types of gene editing are relatively uncontroversial, GGE has been strongly resisted. In this article, we analyse the ethical arguments for and against pursuing GGE by allowing and funding its development. We argue there is a strong case for pursuing GGE for the prevention of disease. We then examine objections that have been raised against pursuing GGE and argue that these fail. We conclude that the moral case in favour of pursuing GGE is stronger than the case against. This suggests that pursuing GGE is morally permissible and indeed morally desirable.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:49:37Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d483e5fb-495c-4180-9383-efb384674d38
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:49:37Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d483e5fb-495c-4180-9383-efb384674d382022-03-27T08:19:10ZThe ethics of germline gene editingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d483e5fb-495c-4180-9383-efb384674d38Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Gyngell, CDouglas, TSavulescu, JGermline Gene Editing (GGE) has enormous potential both as a research tool and a therapeutic intervention. While other types of gene editing are relatively uncontroversial, GGE has been strongly resisted. In this article, we analyse the ethical arguments for and against pursuing GGE by allowing and funding its development. We argue there is a strong case for pursuing GGE for the prevention of disease. We then examine objections that have been raised against pursuing GGE and argue that these fail. We conclude that the moral case in favour of pursuing GGE is stronger than the case against. This suggests that pursuing GGE is morally permissible and indeed morally desirable.
spellingShingle Gyngell, C
Douglas, T
Savulescu, J
The ethics of germline gene editing
title The ethics of germline gene editing
title_full The ethics of germline gene editing
title_fullStr The ethics of germline gene editing
title_full_unstemmed The ethics of germline gene editing
title_short The ethics of germline gene editing
title_sort ethics of germline gene editing
work_keys_str_mv AT gyngellc theethicsofgermlinegeneediting
AT douglast theethicsofgermlinegeneediting
AT savulescuj theethicsofgermlinegeneediting
AT gyngellc ethicsofgermlinegeneediting
AT douglast ethicsofgermlinegeneediting
AT savulescuj ethicsofgermlinegeneediting