Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China

Representation of dust sources remains a key challenge in quantifying the dust cycle and its environmental and climatic impacts. Direct measurements of dust fluxes from different landform types are useful in understanding the nature of dust emission and characterizing the dynamics of soil erodibilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cui, M, Lu, H, Wiggs, GFS, Etyemezian, V, Sweeney, MR, Xu, Z
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
_version_ 1797097036766511104
author Cui, M
Lu, H
Wiggs, GFS
Etyemezian, V
Sweeney, MR
Xu, Z
author_facet Cui, M
Lu, H
Wiggs, GFS
Etyemezian, V
Sweeney, MR
Xu, Z
author_sort Cui, M
collection OXFORD
description Representation of dust sources remains a key challenge in quantifying the dust cycle and its environmental and climatic impacts. Direct measurements of dust fluxes from different landform types are useful in understanding the nature of dust emission and characterizing the dynamics of soil erodibility. In this study we used the PI‐SWERL® instrument over a seasonal cycle to quantify the potential for PM10 (particles with diameter ≤10 μm) emission from several typical landform types across the Tengger Desert and Mu Us Sandy Land, northern China. Our results indicate sparse grasslands and coppice dunes showed relatively high emission potentials, with emitted fluxes ranging from 10‐1 to 101 mg m‐2 s‐1. These values were up to five times those emitted from sand dunes, and 1‐2 orders of magnitude greater than the emissions from dry lake beds, stone pavements and dense grasslands. Generally, PM10 emission fluxes were seen to peak in the spring months, with significant reductions in summer and autumn (by up to 95%), and in winter (by up to 98%). Variations in soil moisture were likely a primary controlling factor responsible for this seasonality in PM10 emission. Our data provide a relative quantification of differences in dust emission potential from several key landform types. Such data allow for the evaluation of current dust source schemes proposed by prior researchers. Moreover, our data will allow improvements in properly characterizing the erodibility of dust source regions and hence refine the parameterization of dust emission in climate models.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:49:56Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d49b7d7b-6138-4c76-bc2c-77d948e305c0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:49:56Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d49b7d7b-6138-4c76-bc2c-77d948e305c02022-03-27T08:19:52ZQuantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern ChinaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d49b7d7b-6138-4c76-bc2c-77d948e305c0EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2019Cui, MLu, HWiggs, GFSEtyemezian, VSweeney, MRXu, ZRepresentation of dust sources remains a key challenge in quantifying the dust cycle and its environmental and climatic impacts. Direct measurements of dust fluxes from different landform types are useful in understanding the nature of dust emission and characterizing the dynamics of soil erodibility. In this study we used the PI‐SWERL® instrument over a seasonal cycle to quantify the potential for PM10 (particles with diameter ≤10 μm) emission from several typical landform types across the Tengger Desert and Mu Us Sandy Land, northern China. Our results indicate sparse grasslands and coppice dunes showed relatively high emission potentials, with emitted fluxes ranging from 10‐1 to 101 mg m‐2 s‐1. These values were up to five times those emitted from sand dunes, and 1‐2 orders of magnitude greater than the emissions from dry lake beds, stone pavements and dense grasslands. Generally, PM10 emission fluxes were seen to peak in the spring months, with significant reductions in summer and autumn (by up to 95%), and in winter (by up to 98%). Variations in soil moisture were likely a primary controlling factor responsible for this seasonality in PM10 emission. Our data provide a relative quantification of differences in dust emission potential from several key landform types. Such data allow for the evaluation of current dust source schemes proposed by prior researchers. Moreover, our data will allow improvements in properly characterizing the erodibility of dust source regions and hence refine the parameterization of dust emission in climate models.
spellingShingle Cui, M
Lu, H
Wiggs, GFS
Etyemezian, V
Sweeney, MR
Xu, Z
Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title_full Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title_fullStr Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title_short Quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern China
title_sort quantifying the effect of geomorphology on aeolian dust emission potential in northern china
work_keys_str_mv AT cuim quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina
AT luh quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina
AT wiggsgfs quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina
AT etyemezianv quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina
AT sweeneymr quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina
AT xuz quantifyingtheeffectofgeomorphologyonaeoliandustemissionpotentialinnorthernchina