The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot

On a flight to Philadelphia, an ageing American of Palestinian origin insisted on a conversation. He regaled his neighbouring passenger with his reasons for supporting Donald Trump in his presidential campaign, citing his reason as the surprising claim that Trump would overturn Jewish interests prev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, R
Format: Journal article
Published: Taylor and Francis 2018
_version_ 1797097041249173504
author Johnson, R
author_facet Johnson, R
author_sort Johnson, R
collection OXFORD
description On a flight to Philadelphia, an ageing American of Palestinian origin insisted on a conversation. He regaled his neighbouring passenger with his reasons for supporting Donald Trump in his presidential campaign, citing his reason as the surprising claim that Trump would overturn Jewish interests prevailing in the capital. The gentleman then went on to extol the virtues of strong leadership, comparing Trump to the Egyptian nationalist leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, but, after an hour of hagiography, he condemned only one thing: Nasser’s apparent unwillingness to tear up the Sykes–Picot Agreement. Interrogated further, he claimed this instrument of humiliation proved that the West had set out to subordinate the Arabs and set them against each other. But he admitted he knew very little of the details, except that, the ‘facts are widely known’. He seemed genuinely disappointed that Nasser had not ‘gone further’ and ‘united all Arabs’ and overturned Sykes–Picot.1 Such views are not uncommon across the Middle East.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:50:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d4a10b6e-8812-4895-9873-c92a97f4a489
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:50:03Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d4a10b6e-8812-4895-9873-c92a97f4a4892022-03-27T08:20:16ZThe de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–PicotJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d4a10b6e-8812-4895-9873-c92a97f4a489Symplectic Elements at OxfordTaylor and Francis2018Johnson, ROn a flight to Philadelphia, an ageing American of Palestinian origin insisted on a conversation. He regaled his neighbouring passenger with his reasons for supporting Donald Trump in his presidential campaign, citing his reason as the surprising claim that Trump would overturn Jewish interests prevailing in the capital. The gentleman then went on to extol the virtues of strong leadership, comparing Trump to the Egyptian nationalist leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, but, after an hour of hagiography, he condemned only one thing: Nasser’s apparent unwillingness to tear up the Sykes–Picot Agreement. Interrogated further, he claimed this instrument of humiliation proved that the West had set out to subordinate the Arabs and set them against each other. But he admitted he knew very little of the details, except that, the ‘facts are widely known’. He seemed genuinely disappointed that Nasser had not ‘gone further’ and ‘united all Arabs’ and overturned Sykes–Picot.1 Such views are not uncommon across the Middle East.
spellingShingle Johnson, R
The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title_full The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title_fullStr The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title_full_unstemmed The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title_short The de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot
title_sort de bunsen committee and a revision of the conspiracy of sykes picot
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonr thedebunsencommitteeandarevisionoftheconspiracyofsykespicot
AT johnsonr debunsencommitteeandarevisionoftheconspiracyofsykespicot