Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: No prospective studies are available on serum cotinine level as a marker of lung cancer risk. METHODS: We analyzed serum cotinine level among 1,741 individuals enrolled since the 1970s in a prospective study of Norwegian volunteers who developed lung cancer during the follow-up and 1,74...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boffetta, P, Clark, S, Shen, M, Gislefoss, R, Peto, R, Andersen, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
_version_ 1797097112726405120
author Boffetta, P
Clark, S
Shen, M
Gislefoss, R
Peto, R
Andersen, A
author_facet Boffetta, P
Clark, S
Shen, M
Gislefoss, R
Peto, R
Andersen, A
author_sort Boffetta, P
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: No prospective studies are available on serum cotinine level as a marker of lung cancer risk. METHODS: We analyzed serum cotinine level among 1,741 individuals enrolled since the 1970s in a prospective study of Norwegian volunteers who developed lung cancer during the follow-up and 1,741 matched controls free from lung cancer. Serum cotinine was measured with a competitive immunoassay. Regression dilution was corrected for based on repeated measures on samples from 747 subjects. RESULTS: Mean serum cotinine level was higher in cases than in controls. Compared with subjects with a cotinine level of < or = 5 ng/mL, the odds ratio of lung cancer was increasing linearly, reaching 55.1 (95% confidence interval, 35.7-85.0) among individuals with a serum cotinine level of > 378 ng/mL. There was no clear suggestion of a plateau in risk at high exposure levels. Odds ratios were very similar in men and women. We found no association between serum cotinine level (range, 0.1-9.9 ng/mL) and lung cancer risk among self-reported nonsmokers and long-term quitters (79 cases and 350 controls). DISCUSSION: The association between tobacco smoking and lung cancer risk might be stronger than is estimated from questionnaire-based studies. Serum cotinine level is a predictor of risk of lung cancer among smokers. The reported plateau in risk at high doses is likely due mainly to artifacts. There is no difference between men and women in the carcinogenicity of tobacco smoking.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:50:59Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d4f10de7-8e8c-40cd-a5ea-70ac642e4eee
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:50:59Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d4f10de7-8e8c-40cd-a5ea-70ac642e4eee2022-03-27T08:22:27ZSerum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d4f10de7-8e8c-40cd-a5ea-70ac642e4eeeEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Boffetta, PClark, SShen, MGislefoss, RPeto, RAndersen, A BACKGROUND: No prospective studies are available on serum cotinine level as a marker of lung cancer risk. METHODS: We analyzed serum cotinine level among 1,741 individuals enrolled since the 1970s in a prospective study of Norwegian volunteers who developed lung cancer during the follow-up and 1,741 matched controls free from lung cancer. Serum cotinine was measured with a competitive immunoassay. Regression dilution was corrected for based on repeated measures on samples from 747 subjects. RESULTS: Mean serum cotinine level was higher in cases than in controls. Compared with subjects with a cotinine level of < or = 5 ng/mL, the odds ratio of lung cancer was increasing linearly, reaching 55.1 (95% confidence interval, 35.7-85.0) among individuals with a serum cotinine level of > 378 ng/mL. There was no clear suggestion of a plateau in risk at high exposure levels. Odds ratios were very similar in men and women. We found no association between serum cotinine level (range, 0.1-9.9 ng/mL) and lung cancer risk among self-reported nonsmokers and long-term quitters (79 cases and 350 controls). DISCUSSION: The association between tobacco smoking and lung cancer risk might be stronger than is estimated from questionnaire-based studies. Serum cotinine level is a predictor of risk of lung cancer among smokers. The reported plateau in risk at high doses is likely due mainly to artifacts. There is no difference between men and women in the carcinogenicity of tobacco smoking.
spellingShingle Boffetta, P
Clark, S
Shen, M
Gislefoss, R
Peto, R
Andersen, A
Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title_full Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title_fullStr Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title_full_unstemmed Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title_short Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk.
title_sort serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk
work_keys_str_mv AT boffettap serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk
AT clarks serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk
AT shenm serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk
AT gislefossr serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk
AT petor serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk
AT andersena serumcotininelevelaspredictoroflungcancerrisk