Are pain and function better measures of outcome than revision rates after TKR in the younger patient?
Revision is the gold standard outcome measurement for survival analyses of orthopaedic implants but reliance on revision as an endpoint has been recently questioned. This study, that assesses long-term outcome in a specific group of patients who had undergone total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoar...
Main Authors: | Price, A, Longino, D, Rees, J, Rout, R, Pandit, H, Javaid, K, Arden, N, Cooper, C, Carr, A, Dodd, C, Murray, D, Beard, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Similar Items
-
How effective are added constraints in improving TKR kinematics?
by: van Duren, B, et al.
Published: (2007) -
The long-term survival results of total knee arthroplasty in patients under the age of 60 years: Implant vs clinical outcomes
by: Javaid, M, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age.
by: Price, A, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.
by: Liow, R, et al.
Published: (1997) -
How effective are added constraints in improving TKR kinematics? (Journal of Biomechanics (2007) 40, SUPPL. 1, (S31-S37) DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02. 016)
by: Van Duren, B, et al.
Published: (2008)