A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures of the skull, provides a paradigm for investigating the interplay of genetic and environmental factors leading to malformation. Over the past 20 years molecular genetic techniques have provided a new approach to dissect the underl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Twigg, S, Wilkie, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cell Press 2015
_version_ 1797097303081746432
author Twigg, S
Wilkie, A
author_facet Twigg, S
Wilkie, A
author_sort Twigg, S
collection OXFORD
description Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures of the skull, provides a paradigm for investigating the interplay of genetic and environmental factors leading to malformation. Over the past 20 years molecular genetic techniques have provided a new approach to dissect the underlying causes; success has mostly come from investigation of clinical samples, and recent advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing have dramatically enhanced the study of the human as the preferred "model organism." In parallel, however, we need a pathogenetic classification to describe the pathways and processes that lead to cranial suture fusion. Given the prenatal onset of most craniosynostosis, investigation of mechanisms requires more conventional model organisms; principally the mouse, because of similarities in cranial suture development. We present a framework for classifying genetic causes of craniosynostosis based on current understanding of cranial suture biology and molecular and developmental pathogenesis. Of note, few pathologies result from complete loss of gene function. Instead, biochemical mechanisms involving haploinsufficiency, dominant gain-of-function and recessive hypomorphic mutations, and an unusual X-linked cellular interference process have all been implicated. Although few of the genes involved could have been predicted based on expression patterns alone (because the genes play much wider roles in embryonic development or cellular homeostasis), we argue that they fit into a limited number of functional modules active at different stages of cranial suture development. This provides a useful approach both when defining the potential role of new candidate genes in craniosynostosis and, potentially, for devising pharmacological approaches to therapy.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:53:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d5ce70cb-23d4-4660-acb8-eb216444ba24
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:53:35Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Cell Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d5ce70cb-23d4-4660-acb8-eb216444ba242022-03-27T08:28:45ZA genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d5ce70cb-23d4-4660-acb8-eb216444ba24EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordCell Press2015Twigg, SWilkie, ACraniosynostosis, the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures of the skull, provides a paradigm for investigating the interplay of genetic and environmental factors leading to malformation. Over the past 20 years molecular genetic techniques have provided a new approach to dissect the underlying causes; success has mostly come from investigation of clinical samples, and recent advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing have dramatically enhanced the study of the human as the preferred "model organism." In parallel, however, we need a pathogenetic classification to describe the pathways and processes that lead to cranial suture fusion. Given the prenatal onset of most craniosynostosis, investigation of mechanisms requires more conventional model organisms; principally the mouse, because of similarities in cranial suture development. We present a framework for classifying genetic causes of craniosynostosis based on current understanding of cranial suture biology and molecular and developmental pathogenesis. Of note, few pathologies result from complete loss of gene function. Instead, biochemical mechanisms involving haploinsufficiency, dominant gain-of-function and recessive hypomorphic mutations, and an unusual X-linked cellular interference process have all been implicated. Although few of the genes involved could have been predicted based on expression patterns alone (because the genes play much wider roles in embryonic development or cellular homeostasis), we argue that they fit into a limited number of functional modules active at different stages of cranial suture development. This provides a useful approach both when defining the potential role of new candidate genes in craniosynostosis and, potentially, for devising pharmacological approaches to therapy.
spellingShingle Twigg, S
Wilkie, A
A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title_full A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title_fullStr A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title_full_unstemmed A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title_short A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
title_sort genetic pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis
work_keys_str_mv AT twiggs ageneticpathophysiologicalframeworkforcraniosynostosis
AT wilkiea ageneticpathophysiologicalframeworkforcraniosynostosis
AT twiggs geneticpathophysiologicalframeworkforcraniosynostosis
AT wilkiea geneticpathophysiologicalframeworkforcraniosynostosis