Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
BACKGROUND: While remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) protects the mature heart against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, the effect on the neonatal heart is not known. The neonatal heart relies almost solely on carbohydrate metabolism, which is modified by rIPC in the mature heart. We hypothesiz...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Journal article |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
2014
|
| _version_ | 1826299102831312896 |
|---|---|
| author | Schmidt, MR Støttrup, N Contractor, H Hyldebrandt, J Johannsen, M Pedersen, C Birkler, R Ashrafian, H Sørensen, K Kharbanda, R Redington, A Bøtker, H |
| author_facet | Schmidt, MR Støttrup, N Contractor, H Hyldebrandt, J Johannsen, M Pedersen, C Birkler, R Ashrafian, H Sørensen, K Kharbanda, R Redington, A Bøtker, H |
| author_sort | Schmidt, MR |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | BACKGROUND: While remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) protects the mature heart against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, the effect on the neonatal heart is not known. The neonatal heart relies almost solely on carbohydrate metabolism, which is modified by rIPC in the mature heart. We hypothesized that rIPC combined with metabolic support with glucose-insulin (GI) infusion improves cardiac function and reduces infarct size after IR injury in neonatal piglets in-vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: 32 newborn piglets were randomized into 4 groups: control, GI, GI+rIPC and rIPC. GI and GI+rIPC groups received GI infusion continuously from 40 min prior to ischemia. rIPC and GI+rIPC groups underwent four cycles of 5 min limb ischemia. Myocardial IR injury was induced by 40 min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery followed by 2 h reperfusion. Myocardial lactate concentrations were assessed in microdialysis samples analyzed by mass spectrometry. Infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Systolic recovery (dP/dt(max) as % of baseline) after 2 h reperfusion was 68.5±13.8% in control, 53.7±11.2% in rIPC (p<0.05), and improved in GI (83.6±18.8%, p<0.05) and GI+rIPC (87.0±15.7%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: rIPC+GI protects the neonatal porcine heart against IR injury in-vivo. rIPC alone has detrimental metabolic and functional effects that are abrogated by simultaneous GI infusion. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:56:49Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:d6e060c9-1f3a-467d-a209-c348e3eecb1c |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T04:56:49Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:d6e060c9-1f3a-467d-a209-c348e3eecb1c2022-03-27T08:36:57ZRemote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d6e060c9-1f3a-467d-a209-c348e3eecb1cEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Schmidt, MRStøttrup, NContractor, HHyldebrandt, JJohannsen, MPedersen, CBirkler, RAshrafian, HSørensen, KKharbanda, RRedington, ABøtker, HBACKGROUND: While remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) protects the mature heart against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, the effect on the neonatal heart is not known. The neonatal heart relies almost solely on carbohydrate metabolism, which is modified by rIPC in the mature heart. We hypothesized that rIPC combined with metabolic support with glucose-insulin (GI) infusion improves cardiac function and reduces infarct size after IR injury in neonatal piglets in-vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: 32 newborn piglets were randomized into 4 groups: control, GI, GI+rIPC and rIPC. GI and GI+rIPC groups received GI infusion continuously from 40 min prior to ischemia. rIPC and GI+rIPC groups underwent four cycles of 5 min limb ischemia. Myocardial IR injury was induced by 40 min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery followed by 2 h reperfusion. Myocardial lactate concentrations were assessed in microdialysis samples analyzed by mass spectrometry. Infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Systolic recovery (dP/dt(max) as % of baseline) after 2 h reperfusion was 68.5±13.8% in control, 53.7±11.2% in rIPC (p<0.05), and improved in GI (83.6±18.8%, p<0.05) and GI+rIPC (87.0±15.7%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: rIPC+GI protects the neonatal porcine heart against IR injury in-vivo. rIPC alone has detrimental metabolic and functional effects that are abrogated by simultaneous GI infusion. |
| spellingShingle | Schmidt, MR Støttrup, N Contractor, H Hyldebrandt, J Johannsen, M Pedersen, C Birkler, R Ashrafian, H Sørensen, K Kharbanda, R Redington, A Bøtker, H Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title | Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title_full | Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title_fullStr | Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title_short | Remote ischemic preconditioning with--but not without--metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. |
| title_sort | remote ischemic preconditioning with but not without metabolic support protects the neonatal porcine heart against ischemia reperfusion injury |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtmr remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT støttrupn remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT contractorh remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT hyldebrandtj remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT johannsenm remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT pedersenc remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT birklerr remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT ashrafianh remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT sørensenk remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT kharbandar remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT redingtona remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury AT bøtkerh remoteischemicpreconditioningwithbutnotwithoutmetabolicsupportprotectstheneonatalporcineheartagainstischemiareperfusioninjury |