Knowability and constructivism
If anti-realism is defined as the principle that all truths are knowable, then anti-realists have a reason to revise logic. For an argument first published by Fitch seems to reduce anti-realism to absurdity within classical but not constructivist logic. One might try to sever this link between anti-...
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Eará dahkkit: | |
| Materiálatiipa: | Journal article |
| Giella: | English |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Blackwell Publishing
1988
|
| Fáttát: |
| Čoahkkáigeassu: | If anti-realism is defined as the principle that all truths are knowable, then anti-realists have a reason to revise logic. For an argument first published by Fitch seems to reduce anti-realism to absurdity within classical but not constructivist logic. One might try to sever this link between anti-realism and revisionism in logic by giving either a modified version of anti-realism not vulnerable to Fitch's argument within classical logic or a modified version of Fitch's argument to which anti-realism is vulnerable within constructivist logic. |
|---|