Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts

Biodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Princi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Booth, H, Bang, A, Bull, J, Moreno-Ternero, JD, Milner-Gulland, E, Squires, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cell Press 2024
_version_ 1817931005681467392
author Booth, H
Bang, A
Bull, J
Moreno-Ternero, JD
Milner-Gulland, E
Squires, D
author_facet Booth, H
Bang, A
Bull, J
Moreno-Ternero, JD
Milner-Gulland, E
Squires, D
author_sort Booth, H
collection OXFORD
description Biodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Principles of fair allocation – which are grounded in longstanding theories of justice and are mathematically operationalizable – are rarely used in biodiversity decision-making but can help to deliver procedural and distributive justice alongside biodiversity outcomes. We show how incorporating rules of fair allocation into biodiversity decision-making could advance policy formulation towards a safe and just future. Such rules provide a means to operationalize equity and create space for cooperatively and constructively negotiating avoidance liabilities within biodiversity impact mitigation.
first_indexed 2024-12-09T03:15:09Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d815ceaa-9daa-4ded-8427-228b538c2fcd
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:15:09Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Cell Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d815ceaa-9daa-4ded-8427-228b538c2fcd2024-10-18T06:52:19ZFair division for avoidance of biodiversity impactsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d815ceaa-9daa-4ded-8427-228b538c2fcdEnglishSymplectic ElementsCell Press2024Booth, HBang, ABull, JMoreno-Ternero, JDMilner-Gulland, ESquires, DBiodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Principles of fair allocation – which are grounded in longstanding theories of justice and are mathematically operationalizable – are rarely used in biodiversity decision-making but can help to deliver procedural and distributive justice alongside biodiversity outcomes. We show how incorporating rules of fair allocation into biodiversity decision-making could advance policy formulation towards a safe and just future. Such rules provide a means to operationalize equity and create space for cooperatively and constructively negotiating avoidance liabilities within biodiversity impact mitigation.
spellingShingle Booth, H
Bang, A
Bull, J
Moreno-Ternero, JD
Milner-Gulland, E
Squires, D
Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title_full Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title_fullStr Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title_full_unstemmed Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title_short Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
title_sort fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts
work_keys_str_mv AT boothh fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts
AT banga fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts
AT bullj fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts
AT morenoternerojd fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts
AT milnergullande fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts
AT squiresd fairdivisionforavoidanceofbiodiversityimpacts