Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.

BACKGROUND: The CONSORT statement is intended to improve reporting of randomised controlled trials and focuses on minimising the risk of bias (internal validity). The applicability of a trial's results (generalisability or external validity) is also important, particularly for pragmatic trials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zwarenstein, M, Treweek, S, Gagnier, J, Altman, D, Tunis, S, Haynes, B, Oxman, A, Moher, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797097944022777856
author Zwarenstein, M
Treweek, S
Gagnier, J
Altman, D
Tunis, S
Haynes, B
Oxman, A
Moher, D
author_facet Zwarenstein, M
Treweek, S
Gagnier, J
Altman, D
Tunis, S
Haynes, B
Oxman, A
Moher, D
author_sort Zwarenstein, M
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: The CONSORT statement is intended to improve reporting of randomised controlled trials and focuses on minimising the risk of bias (internal validity). The applicability of a trial's results (generalisability or external validity) is also important, particularly for pragmatic trials. A pragmatic trial (a term first used in 1967 by Schwartz and Lellouch) can be broadly defined as a randomised controlled trial whose purpose is to inform decisions about practice. This extension of the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of such trials and focuses on applicability. Methods At two, two-day meetings held in Toronto in 2005 and 2008, we reviewed the CONSORT statement and its extensions, the literature on pragmatic trials and applicability, and our experiences in conducting pragmatic trials. Recommendations We recommend extending eight CONSORT checklist items for reporting of pragmatic trials: the background, participants, interventions, outcomes, sample size, blinding, participant flow, and generalisability of the findings. These extensions are presented, along with illustrative examples of reporting, and an explanation of each extension. Adherence to these reporting criteria will make it easier for decision makers to judge how applicable the results of randomised controlled trials are to their own conditions. Empirical studies are needed to ascertain the usefulness and comprehensiveness of these CONSORT checklist item extensions. In the meantime we recommend that those who support, conduct, and report pragmatic trials should use this extension of the CONSORT statement to facilitate the use of trial results in decisions about health care.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:02:33Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d8ca207f-9b52-4671-b194-86be0a1ca5f0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:02:33Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d8ca207f-9b52-4671-b194-86be0a1ca5f02022-03-27T08:51:19ZImproving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d8ca207f-9b52-4671-b194-86be0a1ca5f0EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Zwarenstein, MTreweek, SGagnier, JAltman, DTunis, SHaynes, BOxman, AMoher, D BACKGROUND: The CONSORT statement is intended to improve reporting of randomised controlled trials and focuses on minimising the risk of bias (internal validity). The applicability of a trial's results (generalisability or external validity) is also important, particularly for pragmatic trials. A pragmatic trial (a term first used in 1967 by Schwartz and Lellouch) can be broadly defined as a randomised controlled trial whose purpose is to inform decisions about practice. This extension of the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of such trials and focuses on applicability. Methods At two, two-day meetings held in Toronto in 2005 and 2008, we reviewed the CONSORT statement and its extensions, the literature on pragmatic trials and applicability, and our experiences in conducting pragmatic trials. Recommendations We recommend extending eight CONSORT checklist items for reporting of pragmatic trials: the background, participants, interventions, outcomes, sample size, blinding, participant flow, and generalisability of the findings. These extensions are presented, along with illustrative examples of reporting, and an explanation of each extension. Adherence to these reporting criteria will make it easier for decision makers to judge how applicable the results of randomised controlled trials are to their own conditions. Empirical studies are needed to ascertain the usefulness and comprehensiveness of these CONSORT checklist item extensions. In the meantime we recommend that those who support, conduct, and report pragmatic trials should use this extension of the CONSORT statement to facilitate the use of trial results in decisions about health care.
spellingShingle Zwarenstein, M
Treweek, S
Gagnier, J
Altman, D
Tunis, S
Haynes, B
Oxman, A
Moher, D
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title_full Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title_fullStr Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title_full_unstemmed Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title_short Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
title_sort improving the reporting of pragmatic trials an extension of the consort statement
work_keys_str_mv AT zwarensteinm improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT treweeks improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT gagnierj improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT altmand improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT tuniss improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT haynesb improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT oxmana improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement
AT moherd improvingthereportingofpragmatictrialsanextensionoftheconsortstatement