Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election

The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bovet, A, Makse, HA
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Nature Research 2019
Subjects:
_version_ 1797097972642611200
author Bovet, A
Makse, HA
author_facet Bovet, A
Makse, HA
author_sort Bovet, A
collection OXFORD
description The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources. co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:02:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:d8f37949-cafb-45bd-bf0f-ced562d8b2e5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:02:58Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Research
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d8f37949-cafb-45bd-bf0f-ced562d8b2e52022-03-27T08:52:27ZInfluence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential electionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:d8f37949-cafb-45bd-bf0f-ced562d8b2e5statistical physicscomplex networkscommunicationpoliticsEnglishSymplectic ElementsNature Research2019Bovet, AMakse, HAThe dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources. co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.
spellingShingle statistical physics
complex networks
communication
politics
Bovet, A
Makse, HA
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title_full Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title_fullStr Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title_full_unstemmed Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title_short Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
title_sort influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election
topic statistical physics
complex networks
communication
politics
work_keys_str_mv AT boveta influenceoffakenewsintwitterduringthe2016uspresidentialelection
AT makseha influenceoffakenewsintwitterduringthe2016uspresidentialelection