Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)

<p>The purpose of this account of how deixis is encoded in Toda Sedeq, an Austronesian language indigenous to Taiwan, is two-fold; to contribute to 1) the description of a completely neglected dialect of a poorly understood language which faces language replacement and is in urgent need of des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kerby, J
Other Authors: Dalrymple, M
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
_version_ 1797097990985351168
author Kerby, J
author2 Dalrymple, M
author_facet Dalrymple, M
Kerby, J
author_sort Kerby, J
collection OXFORD
description <p>The purpose of this account of how deixis is encoded in Toda Sedeq, an Austronesian language indigenous to Taiwan, is two-fold; to contribute to 1) the description of a completely neglected dialect of a poorly understood language which faces language replacement and is in urgent need of description and 2) the theoretical understanding of deixis.</p> <p>From a theoretical standpoint, deixis has five categories, with a hierarchy as to which are most often represented in various language phenomena, viz.,: 1) ‘space’, 2) ‘person’, 3) ‘time’, 4) ‘social relations’ and 5) ‘discourse’ (in descending order). This hierarchy helps explain numbers of phenomena representing each category in the grammar of a given language, and also how likely a given category is to serve as the ‘template’ for combinations with other categories (e.g., ‘space’ is a template for ‘spatio-personal deixis’).</p> <p>For the target language, the categories are represented by numbers of phenomena that support the following hierarchy: 1) the most, with 2)-3) following, and practically nothing for 4)-5). Additionally, for two-way category combinations, 1) space was found to combine with all other categories, but 2) person with only two and the other three categories with none at all - also in keeping with the hierarchy. Finally, in the only triple category combination (spatio-personal-temporal deixis), categories 1) - 3) were all found to play important roles.</p> <p>The Sedeq deictic morphemes work in groups rather than independently (seven morphemes are combined into eight groups, each of which forms a grammatical subsystem, with multiple membership for all morphemes).</p> <p>The five-category deixis, category combinations, and morpheme grouping models have resulted in what I believe accounts for the deictic phenomena of the language more completely than any previous attempt. It also has implications for theoretical linguistics and raises questions to be addressed in the future description of other languages.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:15Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:d9081b4a-a345-472a-98e5-ef357af04cb5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T05:03:15Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:d9081b4a-a345-472a-98e5-ef357af04cb52022-03-27T08:53:01ZDeictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:d9081b4a-a345-472a-98e5-ef357af04cb5LinguisticsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2014Kerby, JDalrymple, M<p>The purpose of this account of how deixis is encoded in Toda Sedeq, an Austronesian language indigenous to Taiwan, is two-fold; to contribute to 1) the description of a completely neglected dialect of a poorly understood language which faces language replacement and is in urgent need of description and 2) the theoretical understanding of deixis.</p> <p>From a theoretical standpoint, deixis has five categories, with a hierarchy as to which are most often represented in various language phenomena, viz.,: 1) ‘space’, 2) ‘person’, 3) ‘time’, 4) ‘social relations’ and 5) ‘discourse’ (in descending order). This hierarchy helps explain numbers of phenomena representing each category in the grammar of a given language, and also how likely a given category is to serve as the ‘template’ for combinations with other categories (e.g., ‘space’ is a template for ‘spatio-personal deixis’).</p> <p>For the target language, the categories are represented by numbers of phenomena that support the following hierarchy: 1) the most, with 2)-3) following, and practically nothing for 4)-5). Additionally, for two-way category combinations, 1) space was found to combine with all other categories, but 2) person with only two and the other three categories with none at all - also in keeping with the hierarchy. Finally, in the only triple category combination (spatio-personal-temporal deixis), categories 1) - 3) were all found to play important roles.</p> <p>The Sedeq deictic morphemes work in groups rather than independently (seven morphemes are combined into eight groups, each of which forms a grammatical subsystem, with multiple membership for all morphemes).</p> <p>The five-category deixis, category combinations, and morpheme grouping models have resulted in what I believe accounts for the deictic phenomena of the language more completely than any previous attempt. It also has implications for theoretical linguistics and raises questions to be addressed in the future description of other languages.</p>
spellingShingle Linguistics
Kerby, J
Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title_full Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title_fullStr Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title_full_unstemmed Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title_short Deictic categories in Toda Sedeq (Austronesian, Taiwan)
title_sort deictic categories in toda sedeq austronesian taiwan
topic Linguistics
work_keys_str_mv AT kerbyj deicticcategoriesintodasedeqaustronesiantaiwan